delegates_, while such work can be done only by
_representatives_, who must often have the power to act without further
consultation with those who elected them.
[243] George H. Shibley in the _American Federationist_, June, 1910.
[244] Samuel Gompers in the _American Federationist_, 1910.
[245] John Mitchell, "Organized Labor" (Preface).
[246] Eugene V. Debs, _op. cit._
[247] Karl Kautsky in _Die Neue Zeit_, 1909, p. 679.
[248] Karl Kautsky in _Die Neue Zeit_, 1909, p. 680.
[249] Winston Churchill, _op. cit._, pp. 77, 336, 337.
[250] _Die Neue Zeit_, June 11, 1911.
[251] The Weekly Bulletin of the Garment Trades (New York), 1910.
[252] The _Mine Workers' Journal_ (Indianapolis), Aug. 26, 1909, and
April 21, 1910.
CHAPTER V
SYNDICALISM; SOCIALISM THROUGH DIRECT ACTION OF LABOR UNIONS
In America, France, Italy, and England, as well as in Germany (in a
modified form) a new and more radical labor-union policy has been
rapidly gaining the upper hand. This new movement--in its purely
economic, as well as its political, bearings--is of far greater moment
to Socialists than the political tendencies of those unions that
continue to follow the old tactics in their direct relations with
employers.
In America and in England, unfortunately, the name given to this new
movement, "industrial unionism," is somewhat ambiguous. A more correct
term would be "labor" unionism as distinct from "trade" unionism, or
"class unionism" against "sectional unionism." By "industrial unionism"
the promoters of the new movement means that all the employees of a
given industry are to be solidly bound together in a single union
instead of being divided into many separate organizations as so often
happens to-day, and so as to act as a unit against the employer, as, for
example, the steel workers, machinists, longshoremen, structural iron
workers, etc., are all to be united against the Steel Trust. The
essential idea is not any particular form of united action, but united
action. Certainly the united action of all the trades at work under a
single employer or employers' association is of the first importance,
but it is equally important that "industrial" unions so composed should
aid one another, that the united railway organizations, for example,
should be ready to strike with seamen, dockers, etc., as was done in the
recent British strike. An interview with Mr. Vernon Hartshorn, who
recently headed the poll in the
|