FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239  
240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   >>   >|  
olence of the Deity. The great key to the mystery is, perhaps, the imperfection of our own faculties, which see and feel strongly the partial evils which press upon us, but know too little of the general system of the universe, to be aware how the existence of these is to be reconciled with the benevolence of the great Creator. "To drop these speculations, you have much occasion for some mighty spirit, like Lord Byron, to come down and trouble the waters; for, excepting 'The John Bull,'[**] you seem stagnating strangely in London. "Yours, my dear Sir, "Very truly, "WALTER SCOTT. "To John Murray, Esq."-_Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott_, by J. G. Lockhart, Esq., 1838, iii. 92, 93. [[*] "However, the praise often given to Byron has been so exaggerated as to provoke, perhaps, a reaction in which he is unduly disparaged. 'As various in composition as Shakespeare himself, Lord Byron has embraced,' says Sir Walter Scott, 'every topic of human life, and sounded every string on the divine harp, from its slightest to its most powerful and heart-astounding tones.... In the very grand and tremendous drama of Cain,' etc.... 'And Lord Byron has done all this,' Scott adds, 'while managing his pen with the careless and negligent ease of a man of quality.'"--_Poetry of Byron, chosen and arranged by Matthew Arnold_, 1881, p. xiii. Scott does not add anything of the kind. The comparison with Shakespeare was written after Byron's death in May, 1824; the appreciation of Cain in December, 1821 (_vide supra_); while the allusion to "a man of quality" is to be found in an article contributed to the _Quarterly Review_ in 1816!] [[**] The first number of _John Bull_, "For God, the King, and the People," was published Sunday, December 17, 1820. Theodore Hook was the editor, and it is supposed that he owed his appointment to the intervention of Sir Walter Scott. The _raison d'etre_ of _John Bull_ was to write up George IV., and to write down Queen Caroline. "The national movement (in favour of the Queen) was arrested; and George IV. had mainly _John Bull_ to thank for that result."--_A Sketch_, [by J. G. Lockhart], 1852, p. 45.]] [87] {207}["Mysteries," or Mystery Plays, were prior to and distinct from "Moralities." Byron seems to have had some acquaintance with the archaeology of the drama, but it is not easy to divine the source or extent of his knowledge. He may have received and read the Roxburghe reprint of the _C
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239  
240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Walter

 

December

 
Lockhart
 

George

 
Shakespeare
 

divine

 

quality

 
number
 

Arnold

 

Quarterly


Matthew

 

contributed

 

Poetry

 
chosen
 

arranged

 

Review

 
allusion
 

written

 

appreciation

 

comparison


article
 

appointment

 
distinct
 
Moralities
 

Mystery

 
Mysteries
 

acquaintance

 

archaeology

 

received

 

Roxburghe


reprint

 

source

 

extent

 
knowledge
 

Sketch

 

editor

 

supposed

 

Theodore

 

People

 

published


Sunday

 

intervention

 
raison
 

arrested

 

favour

 

result

 

movement

 

national

 

Caroline

 
slightest