FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62  
63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   >>   >|  
5} This passage corresponds roughly to the conclusion of the _Origin_, see Ed. i. p. 482, vi. p. 661. {106} A similar passage occurs in the conclusion of the _Origin_, Ed. i. p. 481, vi. p. 659. Give sketch of the Past,--beginning with facts appearing hostile under present knowledge,--then proceed to geograph. distribution,--order of appearance,--affinities,--morphology &c., &c. Our theory requires a very gradual introduction of new forms{107}, and extermination of the old (to which we shall revert). The extermination of old may sometimes be rapid, but never the introduction. In the groups descended from common parent, our theory requires a perfect gradation not differing more than breed<s> of cattle, or potatoes, or cabbages in forms. I do not mean that a graduated series of animals must have existed, intermediate between horse, mouse, tapir{108}, elephant [or fowl and peacock], but that these must have had a common parent, and between horse and this <?> parent &c., &c., but the common parent may possibly have differed more from either than the two do now from each other. Now what evidence of this is there? So perfect gradation in some departments, that some naturalists have thought that in some large divisions, if all existing forms were collected, a near approach to perfect gradation would be made. But such a notion is preposterous with respect to all, but evidently so with mammals. Other naturalists have thought this would be so if all the specimens entombed in the strata were collected{109}. I conceive there is no probability whatever of this; nevertheless it is certain all the numerous fossil forms fall in<to>, as Buckland remarks, _not_ present classes, families and genera, they fall between them: so is it with new discoveries of existing forms. Most ancient fossils, that is most separated <by> space of time, are most apt to fall between the classes--(but organisms from those countries most separated by space also fall between the classes <_e.g._> Ornithorhyncus?). As far as geological discoveries <go> they tend towards such gradation{110}. Illustrate it with net. Toxodon,--tibia and fibula,--dog and otter,--but so utterly improbable is <it>, in _ex. gr._ Pachydermata, to compose series as perfect as cattle, that if, as many geologists seem to infer, each separate formation presents even an approach to a consecutive history, my theory must be given up. Even if it were consecutive, it would onl
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62  
63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
gradation
 
perfect
 
parent
 

common

 

classes

 
theory
 
series
 

separated

 

present

 

cattle


discoveries

 
existing
 

conclusion

 

collected

 
approach
 

thought

 

naturalists

 

Origin

 

passage

 

introduction


extermination

 

consecutive

 

requires

 

fossil

 

numerous

 
presents
 
Buckland
 

genera

 
formation
 

families


beginning

 

remarks

 

entombed

 

strata

 

specimens

 
corresponds
 

mammals

 

history

 

separate

 

probability


conceive

 

fossils

 
geological
 

compose

 

Pachydermata

 
Illustrate
 
utterly
 

fibula

 

Toxodon

 
ancient