FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  
need> skinned toes. If for some unknown cause he found it would advantage a plant, which <?> like most plants is occasionally visited by bees &c.: if that plant's seed were occasionally eaten by birds and were then carried on to rotten trees, he might select trees with fruit more agreeable to such birds as perched, to ensure their being carried to trees; if he perceived those birds more often dropped the seeds, he might well have selected a bird who would <illegible> rotten trees or [gradually select plants which <he> had proved to live on less and less rotten trees]. Who, seeing how plants vary in garden, what blind foolish man has done{52} in a few years, will deny an all-seeing being in thousands of years could effect (if the Creator chose to do so), either by his own direct foresight or by intermediate means,--which will represent <?> the creator of this universe. Seems usual means. Be it remembered I have nothing to say about life and mind and _all_ forms descending from one common type{53}. I speak of the variation of the existing great divisions of the organised kingdom, how far I would go, hereafter to be seen. {50} The author may possibly have taken the case of the woodpecker from Buffon, _Histoire Nat. des Oiseaux_, T. vii. p. 3, 1780, where however it is treated from a different point of view. He uses it more than once, see for instance _Origin_, Ed. i. pp. 3, 60, 184, vi. pp. 3, 76, 220. The passage in the text corresponds with a discussion on the woodpecker and the mistletoe in _Origin_, Ed. i. p. 3, vi. p. 3. {51} This illustration occurs in the _Origin_, Ed. i. pp. 90, 91, vi. pp. 110, 111. {52} See _Origin_, Ed. i. p. 83, vi. p. 102, where the word _Creator_ is replaced by _Nature_. {53} Note in the original. "Good place to introduce, saying reasons hereafter to be given, how far I extend theory, say to all mammalia--reasons growing weaker and weaker." Before considering whether <there> be any natural means of selection, and secondly (which forms the 2nd Part of this sketch) the far more important point whether the characters and relations of animated <things> are such as favour the idea of wild species being races <?> descended from a common stock, as the varieties of potato or dahlia or cattle having so descended, let us consider probable character of [selected races] wild varieties. _Natural Selection._ De Candolle's w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Origin
 
rotten
 
plants
 

Creator

 

weaker

 
varieties
 
descended
 

reasons

 

woodpecker

 

common


select

 
carried
 

selected

 

occasionally

 
replaced
 

original

 

occurs

 

Nature

 

illustration

 

advantage


instance

 

passage

 

mistletoe

 

corresponds

 

discussion

 
unknown
 
potato
 

dahlia

 
cattle
 

skinned


species

 

Selection

 

Candolle

 

Natural

 

character

 
probable
 

favour

 

growing

 

Before

 

mammalia


theory

 

extend

 
natural
 

important

 

characters

 
relations
 
animated
 

sketch

 

selection

 
introduce