FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322  
323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   >>   >|  
enic advantage in heavy taxes on harmful commodities and unapprovable luxuries. THE "BACK TO THE FARM" MOVEMENT One of the striking accompaniments of the development of American civilization, as of all other civilizations, is the growth of the cities. If (following the practice of the U. S. Census) all places with 2,500 or more population be classed as urban, it appears that 36.1% of the population of the United States was urban in 1890, that the percentage had risen to 40.5 in 1900, and that by 1910 not less than 46.3% of the total population was urban. There are four components of this growth of urban population: (1) excess of births over deaths, (2) immigration from rural districts, (3) immigration from other countries, and (4) the extension of area by incorporation of suburbs. It is not to be supposed that the growth of the cities is wholly at the expense of the country; J. M. Gillette calculates[173] that 29.8% of the actual urban gain of 11,826,000 between 1900 and 1910 was due to migration from the country, the remaining 70.2% being accounted for by the other three causes enumerated. Thus it appears that the movement from country to city is of considerable proportions, even though it be much less than has sometimes been alleged. This movement has eugenic importance because it is generally believed, although more statistical evidence is needed, that families tend to "run out" in a few generations under city conditions; and it is generally agreed that among those who leave the rural districts to go to the cities, there are found many of the best representatives of the country families. If superior people are going to the large cities, and if this removal leads to a smaller reproductive contribution than they would otherwise have made, then the growth of great cities is an important dysgenic factor. This is the view taken by O. F. Cook,[174] when he writes: "Statistically speaking cities are centers of population, but biologically or eugenically speaking they are centers of depopulation. They are like sink-holes or _siguanas_, as the Indians of Guatemala call the places where the streams of their country drop into subterranean channels and disappear. It never happens that cities develop large populations that go out and occupy the surrounding country. The movement of population is always toward the city. The currents of humanity pass into the urban _siguanas_ and are gone." "If the time has reall
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322  
323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

cities

 
country
 
population
 

growth

 
movement
 
generally
 

centers

 

appears

 

speaking

 

families


immigration

 

districts

 
places
 

siguanas

 
representatives
 

superior

 

people

 
smaller
 

reproductive

 

removal


surrounding

 

contribution

 

conditions

 

needed

 

statistical

 
evidence
 

humanity

 

currents

 
occupy
 

agreed


generations

 

streams

 

Statistically

 

subterranean

 
writes
 

Guatemala

 

Indians

 

depopulation

 

biologically

 
eugenically

important
 
dysgenic
 

factor

 

populations

 

develop

 

channels

 

disappear

 

United

 
States
 

percentage