FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918  
919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   >>  
ote 415: At Elba Napoleon told Colonel Campbell that he would have made peace at Chatillon had not England insisted on his giving up Antwerp, and that England was therefore the cause of the war continuing. This letter, however, proves that he was as set on retaining Mainz as Antwerp. Caulaincourt then wished him to make peace while he could do so with credit ("Castlereagh Papers," vol. ix., p. 287).] [Footnote 416: Fournier, pp. 132-137, 284-294, 299.] [Footnote 417: See Metternich's letter to Stadion of February 15th in Fournier, pp. 319, 327.] [Footnote 418: Houssaye, p. 102.] [Footnote 419: Instructions of February 24th to Flahaut, "Corresp.," No. 21359; Hardenberg's "Diary," in Fournier, pp. 363-364.] [Footnote 420: Fournier, pp. 170, 385.] [Footnote 421: _Ibid._, pp. 178-181, 304; Martens, vol. ix., p. 683. Castlereagh, vol. ix., p. 336, calls it "my treaty," and adds that England was practically supplying 300,000 men to the Coalition. One secret article invited Spain and Sweden to accede to the treaty; another stated that Germany was to consist of a federation of sovereign princes, that Holland must receive a "suitable" military frontier, and that Italy, Spain, and Switzerland must be independent, that is, of France; a third bound the allies to keep their armies on a war footing for a suitable time after the peace.] [Footnote 422: See his instructions of March 2nd to Caulaincourt: "Nothing will bring France to do anything that degrades her national character and deposes her from the rank she has held in the world for centuries." But it was precisely that rank which the allies were resolved to assign to her, neither more nor less. The joint allied note of February 29th to the negotiators at Chatillon bade them "announce to the French negotiator that you are ready to discuss, in a spirit of conciliation, every modification that he might be authorized to propose"; but that any essential departure from the terms already proposed by them must lead to a rupture of the negotiations.] [Footnote 423: Letters of March 2nd, 3rd, 4th, to Clarke.] [Footnote 424: Houssaye, p. 156, note. So too Mueffling, "Aus meinem Leben," shows that Bluecher could have crossed the Aisne there or at Pontavaire or Berry-au-Bac.] [Footnote 425: See Napoleon's letters to Clarke of March 4th-6th.] [Footnote 426: Houssaye, pp. 176-188.] [Footnote 427: Mueffling says that Bluecher and Gneisenau feared an attack by _Bernado
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918  
919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   >>  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Fournier

 

Houssaye

 

February

 

England

 

Castlereagh

 
Clarke
 

Chatillon

 
treaty
 

Mueffling


Napoleon

 
Antwerp
 
suitable
 
France
 

allies

 
letter
 

Caulaincourt

 
Bluecher
 

resolved

 

precisely


negotiators
 

assign

 

allied

 

national

 

Nothing

 

attack

 

Bernado

 

instructions

 
degrades
 

deposes


character

 

footing

 

feared

 

centuries

 

Letters

 

meinem

 

letters

 

Pontavaire

 
crossed
 
negotiations

rupture
 

conciliation

 
spirit
 
modification
 

authorized

 
discuss
 

French

 

negotiator

 

propose

 
armies