FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925  
926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   >>  
s. The last important sentence of the 2 p.m. despatch is not given by Houssaye (p. 159), but is printed by Ropes (p. 383), Siborne (vol. i., p. 453), Charras (vol. i., p. 136), and Ollech (p. 131). It proves that _as late as 2 p.m._ Napoleon expected an easy victory over the Prussians.] [Footnote 489: The best authorities give the Prussians 87,000 men, and the French 78,000; but the latter estimate includes the corps of Lobau, 10,000 strong, which did not reach Fleurus till dark.] [Footnote 490: I follow Houssaye's solution of this puzzle as the least unsatisfacty, but it does not show why Napoleon should have been so perplexed. D'Erlon debouched from the wood of Villers Perwin _exactly where he might have been expected_. Was Napoleon puzzled because the corps was heading south-east instead of east?] [Footnote 491: Delbrueck ("Gneisenau," vol. ii., p. 190) shows how the storm favoured the attack.] [Footnote 492: I here follow Delbrueck's "Gneisenau" (vol. ii., p. 194) and Charras (vol. i., p. 163). Reiche ("Mems.," vol ii., p. 193) says that his corps of 30,800 men lost 12,480 on the 15th and 16th: he notes that Bluecher and Nostitz probably owed their escape to the plainness of their uniforms and headgear.] [Footnote 493: "Waterloo Letters," Nos. 163 and 169, prove that the time was 3 p.m. and not 3.30; see also Kincaid's account in Fitchett's "Wellington's Men" (p. 120).] [Footnote 494: "Waterloo Letters," No. 169.] [Footnote 495: See Houssaye, p. 205, for the sequence of these events.] [Footnote 496: Ollech, pp. 167-171. Colonel Basil Jackson, in his "Waterloo and St. Helena" (printed for private circulation), p. 64, states that he had been employed in examining and reporting on the Belgian roads, and did so on the road leading south from Wavre. This report had been sent to Gneisenau, and must have given him greater confidence on the night of the 16th.] [Footnote 497: O'Connor Morris, p. 176, approves Napoleon's criticism, and censures Gneisenau's move on Wavre: but surely Wavre combined more advantages than any other position. It was accessible for the whole Prussian army (including Buelow); it was easily defensible (as the event proved); and it promised a reunion with Wellington for the defence of Brussels. Houssaye says (p. 233) that Gneisenau did not at once foresee the immense consequences of his action. Of course he did not, because he was not sure of Wellington; but he took all the steps t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925  
926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   >>  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Gneisenau

 

Napoleon

 

Houssaye

 

Wellington

 

Waterloo

 
follow
 

Delbrueck

 
printed
 

Letters


Charras

 
expected
 
Ollech
 
Prussians
 

examining

 
confidence
 

reporting

 
employed
 

proves

 

circulation


states
 

Belgian

 

report

 

leading

 

greater

 

private

 

Jackson

 

Fitchett

 
important
 

sequence


Colonel

 

events

 

Helena

 

defence

 

Brussels

 

reunion

 

proved

 

promised

 
foresee
 
immense

consequences
 

action

 
defensible
 
easily
 

censures

 
surely
 

combined

 

criticism

 

approves

 
sentence