FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151  
152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   >>   >|  
e le conseil de se mettre dans l'esprit de la population francaise_.... It was a moral concession, a moral satisfaction. But afterwards, as things went on, all was altered when it came to preparing the treaties. For a while the idea, not only of a reparation of damages, but of the payment of the cost of the War was entertained. It was maintained that the practice of making the vanquished reimburse the cost of the War was permitted by international law. Since Germany had provoked the War and lost it, she must not only furnish an indemnity for the losses, but also pay the cost. The cost was calculated roughly at seven hundred milliards of francs at par. Further, there was the damage to assess. In the aggregate, war costs, damage to property, damage to persons, came to at least one thousand milliards. But since it was impossible to demand immediate payment and was necessary to spread the sum over fifty years, taking into consideration sinking funds and interest the total came to three thousand milliards. The amount was published by the illustrated papers with the usual diagrams, drawings of golden globes, length of paper money if stretched out, height of metal if all piled up together, etc. etc. These figures were discussed for the first few months by a public accustomed to be surprised at nothing. They merely helped to demonstrate that an indemnity of 350 milliards was a real sacrifice for the Allies. Thus a whole series of principles came to be established which were a contradiction of reality. A great share in the responsibility in this matter lies with Great Britain, who not only followed France's error, but in certain ways made it worse by a number of intemperate requests. Italy had no influence on the proceedings owing to her indecisive policy. Only the United States, notwithstanding the banality of some of her experts (_lucus a non lucendo_), spoke an occasional word of reason. When Lloyd George understood the mistake committed in the matter of the indemnity it was too late. The English public found itself face to face with the elections almost the day after the conclusion of the War. In the existing state of exaltation and hatred the candidates found a convenient "plank" in promising the extermination of Germany, the trial of the Kaiser, as well as of thousands of German officers accused of cruelty, and last, but not least, the end of German competition. The Prime Minister of Australia, Willia
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151  
152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
milliards
 

damage

 

indemnity

 

payment

 

matter

 

public

 
thousand
 

Germany

 

German

 

Allies


sacrifice

 

series

 

influence

 

requests

 
number
 

intemperate

 

principles

 

proceedings

 

France

 

reality


responsibility
 

contradiction

 

helped

 
demonstrate
 
indecisive
 

Britain

 

established

 

convenient

 

promising

 

extermination


candidates

 

hatred

 

conclusion

 

existing

 

exaltation

 

Kaiser

 

competition

 
Minister
 

Australia

 

Willia


thousands

 

officers

 
accused
 
cruelty
 

lucendo

 

occasional

 
experts
 

United

 
States
 

notwithstanding