5 | 16 | 27 | 8 | 19 | 30 | 11
-------------------------------------------------------
197 | 22 | 3 | 14 | 26 | 6 | 17 | 29 | 10 | 21 | 2
-------------------------------------------------------
198 | 13 | 24 | 5 | 16 | 27 | 8 | 19 | 30 | 11 | 22
-------------------------------------------------------
199 | 3 | 14 | 26 | 6 | 17 | 29 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 13
=======================================================

For example, the year 1867. The epact is 25, and we find in the table:

J. F. M. AP. M. JU. JL. AU. S. O. N. D.
New 5+ 4 5+ 4 3+ 2 1,31 29 28- 27 26 25
Full 20 19- 20 19- 18 17 16 15 13- 13 11+ 11

When the truth is the day after + is written after the date; when the day
before, -. Thus, the new moon of March is on the 6th; the full moon of
April is on the 18th. {371}

I now introduce a small paradox of my own; and as I am not able to prove
it, I am compelled to declare that any one who shall dissent must be either
very foolish or very dishonest, and will make me quite uncomfortable about
the state of his soul. This being settled once for all, I proceed to say
that the necessity of arriving at the truth about the assertions that the
Nicene Council laid down astronomical tests led me to look at Fathers,
Church histories, etc. to an extent which I never dreamed of before. One
conclusion which I arrived at was, that the Nicene Fathers had a knack of
sticking to the question which many later councils could not acquire. In
our own day, it is not permitted to Convocation seriously to discuss any
one of the points which are bearing so hard upon their resources of
defence--the cursing clauses of the Athanasian Creed, for example. And it
may be collected that the prohibition arises partly from fear that there is
no saying where a beginning, if allowed, would end. There seems to be a
suspicion that debate, once let loose, would play up old Trent with the
liturgy, and bring the whole book to book. But if any one will examine the
real Nicene Creed, without the augmentation, he will admire the way in
which the framers stuck to the point, and settled what they had to decide,
according to their view of it. With such a presumption of good sense in
their favor, it becomes easier to believe in any claim which may be made on
their behalf to tact or sagacity in settling any other matter. And I
strongly suspect such a claim may be made