al., 305 U.S. 297
(1938); Asbury Hospital _v._ Cass County, 326 U.S. 207 (1945);
Connecticut Mutual L. Ins. Co. _v._ Moore, 333 U.S. 541 (1948). For a
notable case in which the obligations clause was mustered into service,
by rather heroic logic, to do work that was afterwards put upon the due
process clause, _see_ State Tax On Foreign-Held Bonds, 15 Wall. 300
(1873).
[1737] Hooven & Allison Co. _v._ Evatt, 324 U.S. 652, 673 (1945).
[1738] Woodruff _v._ Parham, 8 Wall. 123 (1869).
[1739] 12 Wheat. 419 (1827).
[1740] Ibid. 441.
[1741] May & Co. _v._ New Orleans, 178 U.S. 496, 502 (1900).
[1742] Ibid. 501; Gulf Fisheries Co. _v._ MacInerney, 276 U.S. 124
(1928); McGoldrick _v._ Gulf Oil Corp., 309 U.S. 414 (1940).
[1743] Low _v._ Austin, 13 Wall. 29 (1872); May & Co. _v._ New Orleans,
178 U.S. 496 (1900).
[1744] Hooven & Allison Co. _v._ Evatt, 324 U.S. 652, 667 (1945).
[1745] Ibid. 664.
[1746] Canton R. Co. _v._ Rogan, 340 U.S. 511 (1951).
[1747] Brown _v._ Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419, 447 (1827).
[1748] Anglo-Chilean Nitrate Sales Corp. _v._ Alabama, 288 U.S. 218
(1933).
[1749] Low _v._ Austin, 13 Wall. 29, 33 (1872).
[1750] Cook _v._ Pennsylvania, 97 U.S. 566, 573, (1878).
[1751] Crew Levick Co. _v._ Pennsylvania, 245 U.S. 292 (1917).
[1752] Cooley _v._ Board of Port Wardens, 12 How. 299, 313 (1851).
[1753] Waring _v._ Mobile, 8 Wall. 110, 122 (1869). _See also_ Pervear
_v._ Massachusetts, 5 Wall. 475, 478 (1867); Schollenberger _v._
Pennsylvania, 171 U.S. 1, 24 (1898).
[1754] Gulf Fisheries Co. _v._ MacInerney, 276 U.S. 124 (1928).
[1755] Nathan _v._ Louisiana, 8 How. 73, 81 (1850).
[1756] Mager _v._ Grima, 8 How. 490 (1850).
[1757] Brown _v._ Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419, 441 (1827); Hooven & Allison
Co. _v._ Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945).
[1758] New York ex rel. Burke _v._ Wells, 208 U.S. 14 (1908).
[1759] Selliger _v._ Kentucky, 213 U.S. 200 (1909); _cf._ Almy _v._
California, 24 How. 169, 174 (1861).
[1760] Bowman _v._ Chicago & N.W.R. Co., 125 U.S. 465, 488 (1888).
[1761] 107 U.S. 38 (1883).
[1762] Ibid. 55.
[1763] Patapsco Guano Co. _v._ North Carolina Bd. of Agriculture, 171
U.S. 345, 301 (1898). For a discussion of the limitations on State power
to pass inspection laws resulting from the commerce clause, _see_ pp.
183, 237.
[1764] Bowman _v._ Chicago & N.W.R. Co., 125 U.S. 465, 488-489 (1888).
[1765] Clyde Mallory Lines _v._ Alabama ex rel. State Docks Comm
|