FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242  
243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   >>   >|  
lar position in which it may find itself at the time when the occasion for _acting on the question arises_. This shows that England herself reserved the right, whenever her interests required her to do so, to act in violation of the treaty with Belgium. That, at least, is my understanding of Gladstone's language. England did not respect Danish neutrality a hundred years ago, when she destroyed the Danish fleet at Copenhagen because her interests required, and England does not now, through its Asiatic ally, and directly, respect Chinese neutrality, claiming the right primarily to consult her own interests. Should this right, asserted by our own Supreme Court, and actually assumed by England and Japan, be denied to Germany? Finally, I understand that The Hague Conference of 1907 drafted a convention which reads: The territory of neutral powers is inviolable. Belligerents are forbidden to move troops or convoys of either munitions of war or supplies across the territory of a neutral power. Great Britain, Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy refused to sign it and did not sign it. Russia was not represented. MILITARISM. There is one more subject which many people in this country have failed to understand, and that is the matter of militarism. German militarism is supposed to be something dreadful, and many good people believe that it would be a great advance toward eternal peace if that militarism could be wiped out. Well, now, let us see. If Germany did not require every one of her sons to spend a year, or at most two years, in the army, and if she had not provided for all these men sufficient arms and accoutrements for immediate use in case of war, what would have happened when Russia entered her territory, or when France came on a like errand? Any one who lives among enemies is expected to be sufficiently prepared to defend himself should they attack him, be he ever so peaceful. At the time the United States of America was born there was no such thing as Germany. Every country around it had a slice of it. Napoleon took the larger western part of Germany as his property, England held Hanover, the former Kingdom of Poland held Saxony, Austria held Silesia, and so there was no Germany. The Teutonic races had no home in which they could develop and live without interference by others. To prevent such interference Germany of all nations needed an army; to prevent similar interference a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242  
243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Germany

 
England
 

interests

 
territory
 
interference
 

militarism

 

understand

 

neutral

 
Russia
 
Austria

people
 

country

 

required

 

respect

 

Danish

 

prevent

 

neutrality

 

happened

 
entered
 
France

provided

 

errand

 

sufficient

 

accoutrements

 

require

 

Hanover

 
Kingdom
 
Poland
 

Saxony

 
property

larger

 
western
 

Silesia

 
Teutonic
 
nations
 

needed

 
similar
 

develop

 

Napoleon

 
defend

prepared

 

attack

 

sufficiently

 

expected

 

enemies

 

America

 
States
 

eternal

 

peaceful

 

United