FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1139   1140   1141   1142   1143   1144   1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163  
1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   >>   >|  
rove her neutrality when visited by belligerent cruisers; and in both peace and war, to show her national character, and the lawfulness of her voyage, in those ports of other countries to which she may proceed for purposes of trade. It appears to the government of the United States, that the view of this whole subject which is the most naturally taken is also the most legal, and most in analogy with other cases. British cruisers have a right to detain British merchantmen for certain purposes; and they have a right, acquired by treaty, to detain merchant-vessels of several other nations for the same purposes. But they have no right at all to detain an American merchant-vessel. This Lord Aberdeen admits in the fullest manner. Any detention of an American vessel by a British cruiser is therefore a wrong, a trespass; although it may be done under the belief that she was a British vessel, or that she belonged to a nation which had conceded the right of such detention to the British cruisers, and the trespass therefore an involuntary trespass. If a ship of war, in thick weather, or in the darkness of the night, fire upon and sink a neutral vessel, under the belief that she is an enemy's vessel, this is a trespass, a mere wrong; and cannot be said to be an act done under any right, accompanied by responsibility for damages. So if a civil officer on land have process against one individual, and through mistake arrest another, this arrest is wholly tortious; no one would think of saying that it was done under any lawful exercise of authority, subject only to responsibility, or that it was any thing but a mere trespass, though an unintentional trespass. The municipal law does not undertake to lay down beforehand any rule for the government of such cases; and as little, in the opinion of the government of the United States, does the public law of the world lay down beforehand any rule for the government of cases of involuntary trespasses, detentions, and injuries at sea; except that in both classes of cases law and reason make a distinction between injuries committed through mistake and injuries committed by design, the former being entitled to fair and just compensation, the latter demanding exemplary damages, and sometimes personal punishment. The government of the United States has frequently made known its opinion, which it now repeats, that the practice of detaining American vessels, though subject to just compensation if suc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1139   1140   1141   1142   1143   1144   1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163  
1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

trespass

 

government

 
British
 

vessel

 

detain

 

American

 

subject

 
States
 

United

 

purposes


injuries

 

cruisers

 

damages

 

mistake

 
responsibility
 

arrest

 

opinion

 

detention

 

involuntary

 

belief


merchant

 

compensation

 
committed
 
vessels
 
authority
 

exercise

 
lawful
 

unintentional

 
frequently
 
individual

detaining
 

practice

 
wholly
 
tortious
 

repeats

 

reason

 
distinction
 
public
 

classes

 
trespasses

detentions

 

process

 

design

 

exemplary

 

personal

 

municipal

 
demanding
 

entitled

 
undertake
 

punishment