FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202  
1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   1221   >>  
hen leading their country to independence and renown. The undersigned may add, that in 1781 the courts of Russia and Austria proposed a diplomatic congress of the belligerent powers, to which the commissioners of the United States should be admitted. Mr. Huelsemann thinks that in Mr. Mann's instructions improper expressions are introduced in regard to Russia; but the undersigned has no reason to suppose that Russia herself is of that opinion. The only observation made in those instructions about Russia is, that she "has chosen to assume an attitude of interference, and her immense preparations for invading and reducing the Hungarians to the rule of Austria, from which they desire to be released, gave so serious a character to the contest as to awaken the most painful solicitude in the minds of Americans." The undersigned cannot but consider the Austrian Cabinet as unnecessarily susceptible in looking upon language like this as a "hostile demonstration." If we remember that it was addressed by the government to its own agent, and has received publicity only through a communication from one department of the American government to another, the language quoted must be deemed moderate and inoffensive. The comity of nations would hardly forbid its being addressed to the two imperial powers themselves. It is scarcely necessary for the undersigned to say, that the relations of the United States with Russia have always been of the most friendly kind, and have never been deemed by either party to require any compromise of their peculiar views upon subjects of domestic or foreign polity, or the true origin of governments. At any rate, the fact that Austria, in her contest with Hungary, had an intimate and faithful ally in Russia, cannot alter the real nature of the question between Austria and Hungary, nor in any way affect the neutral rights and duties of the government of the United States, or the justifiable sympathies of the American people. It is, indeed, easy to conceive, that favor toward struggling Hungary would be not diminished, but increased, when it was seen that the arm of Austria was strengthened and upheld by a power whose assistance threatened to be, and which in the end proved to be, overwhelmingly destructive of all her hopes. Toward the conclusion of his note Mr. Huelsemarnn remarks, that "if the government of the United States were to think it proper to take an indirect part in the political movements of Eu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202  
1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   1221   >>  



Top keywords:

Russia

 

Austria

 
government
 

States

 

undersigned

 

United

 

Hungary

 
instructions
 

contest

 

addressed


American

 

deemed

 

language

 

powers

 
governments
 

intimate

 

faithful

 

compromise

 

friendly

 

relations


scarcely

 

foreign

 
polity
 
domestic
 
subjects
 

require

 
peculiar
 

origin

 
Toward
 
conclusion

destructive
 

overwhelmingly

 
assistance
 
threatened
 

proved

 

Huelsemarnn

 
indirect
 
political
 

movements

 
proper

remarks

 

upheld

 

duties

 

rights

 

justifiable

 

sympathies

 
people
 

neutral

 
affect
 

question