FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276  
277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   >>   >|  
3/4. I kissed hands and am thereby prime minister for the third time. But, as I trust, for a brief time only. Slept well, _D.G._" The first question was, how many of his colleagues in the liberal cabinet that went out of office six months before, would now embark with him in the voyage into stormy and unexplored seas. I should suppose that no such difficulties (M106) had ever confronted the attempt at making a cabinet since Canning's in 1827. Mr. Gladstone begins the fragment from which I have already quoted with a sentence or two of retrospect, and then proceeds:-- In 1885 (I think) Chamberlain had proposed a plan accepted by Parnell (and supported by me) which, without establishing in Ireland a national parliament, made very considerable advances towards self-government. It was rejected by a small majority of the cabinet--Granville said at the time he would rather take home rule. Spencer thought it would introduce confusion into executive duties. On the present occasion a full half of the former ministers declined to march with me. Spencer and Granville were my main supports. Chamberlain and Trevelyan went with me, their basis being that we were to seek for some method of dealing with the Irish case other than coercion. What Chamberlain's motive was I do not clearly understand. It was stated that he coveted the Irish secretaryship.... To have given him the office would at that time have been held to be a declaration of war against the Irish party. Selborne nibbled at the offer, but I felt that it would not work, and did not use great efforts to bring him in.(181) When I had accepted the commission, Ponsonby brought me a message from the Queen that she hoped there would not be any Separation in the cabinet. The word had not at that time acquired the offensive meaning in which it has since been stereotyped by the so-called unionists; and it was easy to frame a reply in general but strong words. I am bound to say that at Osborne in the course of a long conversation, the Queen was frank and free, and showed none of the "armed neutrality," which as far as I know has been the best definition of her attitude in the more recent years towards a liberal minister. Upon the whole, when I look back upon 1886, and consider the inveterate sentiment of hostility flavoured with contempt towards Ireland, wh
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276  
277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

cabinet

 

Chamberlain

 

Granville

 
minister
 
Ireland
 

accepted

 
Spencer
 

liberal

 

office

 

efforts


dealing
 

message

 

method

 

brought

 

Ponsonby

 
commission
 

declaration

 

understand

 

secretaryship

 
stated

motive

 
coveted
 

nibbled

 

Selborne

 

coercion

 

meaning

 

attitude

 
recent
 

definition

 

neutrality


hostility

 

sentiment

 

flavoured

 

contempt

 

inveterate

 

showed

 

stereotyped

 

called

 

unionists

 

offensive


Separation

 

acquired

 

conversation

 

Osborne

 

general

 

strong

 
ministers
 

confronted

 

attempt

 

making