FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300  
301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   >>   >|  
said in the Irish secretary's room. There too he had urged what he also declared in the House: that he had always insisted that due representation should be given to the minority; that he should welcome any device for preventing ill-considered legislation, but that the provision in the bill, for the veto of the first order, would lead to prolonged obstruction and delay. Subject to modification on these three heads, he accepted the bill. "I am convinced," he said in concluding, "that if our views are fairly met in committee regarding the defects to which I have briefly alluded,--the bill will be cheerfully accepted by the Irish people, and by their representatives, as a solution of the long-standing dispute between the two countries."(204) It transpired at a later date that just before the introduction of the bill, when Mr. Parnell had been made acquainted with its main proposals, he called a meeting of eight of his leading colleagues, told them what these proposals were, and asked them whether they would take the bill or leave it.(205) Some began to object to the absence of certain provisions, such as the immediate control of the constabulary, and the right over duties of customs. Mr. Parnell rose from the table, and clenched the discussion by informing them that if they declined the bill, the government would go. They at once agreed "to accept it _pro tanto_, reserving for committee the right of enforcing and, if necessary, reconsidering their position with regard to these important questions." This is neither more nor less than the form in which Mr. Parnell made his declaration in parliament. There was complete consistency between the terms of this declaration, and the terms of acceptance agreed to by his colleagues, as disclosed in the black days of December four years later. The charge of bad faith and hypocrisy so freely made against the Irishmen is wholly unwarranted by a single word in these proceedings. If the whole transaction had been known to the House of Commons, it could not have impaired by one jot or tittle the value set by the supporters of the bill on the assurances of the Irishmen that, in principle and subject to modification on points named, they accepted the bill as a settlement of the question, and would use their best endeavours to make it work.(206) Chapter VII. The Political Atmosphere. Defeat Of The Bill. (1886) Everything on every side was full of traps and mines.... It was in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300  
301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

accepted

 

Parnell

 

Irishmen

 
committee
 
agreed
 

declaration

 
proposals
 

colleagues

 

modification

 

Everything


complete
 

consistency

 

parliament

 

Defeat

 

December

 
Atmosphere
 

acceptance

 

disclosed

 

reserving

 
accept

government

 
enforcing
 

Political

 

questions

 

important

 

reconsidering

 

position

 
regard
 

impaired

 

endeavours


Commons

 

tittle

 

points

 

settlement

 

subject

 

principle

 

supporters

 

assurances

 

transaction

 

hypocrisy


Chapter

 

question

 

charge

 

freely

 

proceedings

 

single

 
unwarranted
 

declined

 

wholly

 

constabulary