FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32  
33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   >>   >|  
ment. CONCESSION OF BELLIGERENT RIGHTS TO THE REBELS. There has been some dissatisfaction with the conduct of our official communications with Great Britain and France respecting the question on belligerent rights and neutral obligations which the rebellion has raised. But there are points of no inconsiderable difficulty and delicacy involved in these questions, which a great many people, in their natural displeasure against the English and French, have failed to consider. Our Government deserves the credit of having consulted the interests without compromising the dignity of the nation. Admitting the conduct of the British and French Governments in recognizing the rebels as belligerents to be as unfriendly and as unrequired by the obligations of public law as it is generally held to be among us, that would not make it right or wise for our Government to depart from the tone of moderation. We can no more make it a matter for official complaint and demand against these Governments, than we could the unfriendly tone of many of their newspapers and Parliamentary orators. We might say to them: We take it as unkindly in you to do as you have done; but if they will continue to do so, we have nothing for it but to submit. Even if we could have afforded it, we could not rightly have gone to war with them for doing what we ourselves--through the necessity of our circumstances--have been compelled in effect to do, and what they, though not forced by any such necessity, had yet a right--and in their own opinion were obliged--by public law to do. We could not have made it a cause of war, and therefore it would have been worse than idle to indulge in a style of official representation which means war if it means anything. THE REBEL CRUISERS. The question of the rebel cruisers on the high seas is a question by itself. The anger excited among us by the injuries we have suffered from these vessels is not strange; nor is it strange that our anger should beget a disposition to quarrel with Great Britain and France for conceding the rights of lawful belligerents to the perpetrators of such atrocities. The rebels have no courts of admiralty, carry their prizes to no ports, submit them to no lawful adjudication--but capture, plunder, and burn private vessels in mid ocean. Such proceedings by the laws of nations are undoubtedly piratical in their nature. We have a right so to hold and declare. We may think that Great Britain and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32  
33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

question

 

official

 
Britain
 

Government

 

rebels

 

belligerents

 

vessels

 

unfriendly

 

French

 

lawful


strange
 
conduct
 
submit
 

necessity

 

France

 

Governments

 
obligations
 

rights

 

public

 

representation


forced
 

effect

 

compelled

 

circumstances

 

indulge

 

opinion

 

obliged

 

excited

 

private

 

plunder


adjudication
 

capture

 

proceedings

 

declare

 

nature

 

nations

 

undoubtedly

 

piratical

 

prizes

 

injuries


suffered
 

cruisers

 

CRUISERS

 

atrocities

 

courts

 
admiralty
 

perpetrators

 

conceding

 

disposition

 

quarrel