armee d'Espagne._ Odier.
_De l'organization de la force armee en France._ Carion-Nisas.
_Elemens de l'art militaire, &c._ Cugnot.
_Memoires sur la guerre._ Feuquieres.
_Cours d'art militaire et d'histoire._ Jacquinot de Presle.
_Cours d'art militaire._ Fallot.
_Theorie de l'officier superieur._ Leorier.
_Histoire de l'administration de la guerre._ Audouin.
_Instructions diverses a l'usage de l'ecole d'application du corps royal
d'etat-major._
_Handbuch fuer offiziere, &c._ Scharnhorst.
Having omitted all discussion of the several departments of the
administrative service of an army organization, it is not deemed
necessary to give the names of books of reference on the subjects of
pay, courts-martial, medicinal and hospital departments, &c., &c.]
CHAPTER X
ARMY ORGANIZATION.[31]--INFANTRY AND CAVALRY
_Infantry_.--Infantry constitutes, in active service, by far the most
numerous portion of an army; in time of peace its duties are simple,
and, in most countries, of little comparative importance; but in our
country the continually recurring difficulties on the Indian frontiers,
render this arm peculiarly necessary and important, even in time of
general peace. From the nature of infantry service--no peculiar
technical knowledge (we speak of the privates and officers of the lower
grades) being so absolutely indispensable as in the other arms--the
soldier may in a short time be trained and instructed in his duties. For
this reason the ratio of infantry in a peace establishment is ordinarily
much less than in active service, this arm being always capable of great
expansion when occasion requires.
[Footnote 31: In discussing our own organization, it may be well to
compare it with the armies of some of the principal nations of Europe.
Our limits will not allow us to go very much into details, nor to make a
comparison with more than a single European power. We shall select
France, inasmuch as her army organization has served as a model for the
rest of Europe, and is still, in some respects, superior to most
others.]
In the early periods of society, and in countries where horses abounded,
men have usually preferred fighting on horseback; but civilization and a
more thorough acquaintance with war has always increased the importance
of infantry.
The Hebrews, and also the Egyptians, employed this arm almost
exclusively. The Asiatics generally employed both infantry and cavalry,
but with the
|