FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215  
216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   >>   >|  
armee d'Espagne._ Odier. _De l'organization de la force armee en France._ Carion-Nisas. _Elemens de l'art militaire, &c._ Cugnot. _Memoires sur la guerre._ Feuquieres. _Cours d'art militaire et d'histoire._ Jacquinot de Presle. _Cours d'art militaire._ Fallot. _Theorie de l'officier superieur._ Leorier. _Histoire de l'administration de la guerre._ Audouin. _Instructions diverses a l'usage de l'ecole d'application du corps royal d'etat-major._ _Handbuch fuer offiziere, &c._ Scharnhorst. Having omitted all discussion of the several departments of the administrative service of an army organization, it is not deemed necessary to give the names of books of reference on the subjects of pay, courts-martial, medicinal and hospital departments, &c., &c.] CHAPTER X ARMY ORGANIZATION.[31]--INFANTRY AND CAVALRY _Infantry_.--Infantry constitutes, in active service, by far the most numerous portion of an army; in time of peace its duties are simple, and, in most countries, of little comparative importance; but in our country the continually recurring difficulties on the Indian frontiers, render this arm peculiarly necessary and important, even in time of general peace. From the nature of infantry service--no peculiar technical knowledge (we speak of the privates and officers of the lower grades) being so absolutely indispensable as in the other arms--the soldier may in a short time be trained and instructed in his duties. For this reason the ratio of infantry in a peace establishment is ordinarily much less than in active service, this arm being always capable of great expansion when occasion requires. [Footnote 31: In discussing our own organization, it may be well to compare it with the armies of some of the principal nations of Europe. Our limits will not allow us to go very much into details, nor to make a comparison with more than a single European power. We shall select France, inasmuch as her army organization has served as a model for the rest of Europe, and is still, in some respects, superior to most others.] In the early periods of society, and in countries where horses abounded, men have usually preferred fighting on horseback; but civilization and a more thorough acquaintance with war has always increased the importance of infantry. The Hebrews, and also the Egyptians, employed this arm almost exclusively. The Asiatics generally employed both infantry and cavalry, but with the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215  
216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
service
 

infantry

 

organization

 

militaire

 

departments

 

Europe

 

importance

 

Infantry

 

active

 
duties

countries

 

employed

 

France

 

guerre

 

Hebrews

 

expansion

 

Egyptians

 
capable
 
occasion
 
discussing

increased

 

Footnote

 

requires

 

acquaintance

 

generally

 

trained

 

soldier

 

indispensable

 
cavalry
 

instructed


ordinarily
 
exclusively
 

compare

 
establishment
 
Asiatics
 
reason
 

civilization

 

superior

 
respects
 
periods

single
 

comparison

 

society

 
absolutely
 
European
 

select

 

principal

 

nations

 

preferred

 

horseback