FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99  
100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>   >|  
rnament and Dress," by M. Charles Blanc, formerly Director of the French Institute. Eng. Trans., Chapman and Hall, London. [83] See Charles Blanc's "Art in Ornament and Dress," p. 31. [84] Charles Blanc's "Art in Ornament and Dress," p. 43. [85] Charles Blanc's "Art in Ornament and Dress," pp. 43, 45, 46. [86] Chinese design shows naturalistic art arrested and perpetuated on totally different principles. Their representations are all equally allied to their art of picture-painting, whether on china with the brush, or on textiles with the needle. The flatness of the picture is still preserved by their ignorance of perspective. When they attempted to express different distances, they did so by placing them one above another, so that in reading the composition the eye first takes in the distant horizon; next below it, the middle distance; and being thus prepared, it comes down to the actual living foreground, on which rests the dramatic action and interest addressed to the spectator. The Chinese understood many of the secrets of art, yet never achieved perspective. [87] See Mr. Penrose's work on the measurements of the Parthenon at Athens. Published by the Society of the Dilettanti. [88] Marked outlines in embroidery add to the flatness, and enable us to omit cast shadows. In this it differs entirely from pictorial art, where one of the great objects is to avoid flatness. [89] Semper's theory, already mentioned, is that textile design was certainly flat; that it was the first form of decoration, and was followed by bas-relief, which could not at once rid itself of the original motive. [90] Auberville's "Ornamentation des Tissus" (eleventh century). [91] Redgrave's "Manual of Design," pp. 43-45. [92] This idolatrous type was introduced into England by the Buccaneers, and reflected on our carvings and embroideries of the time of James I., slightly modified by the Italian Renaissance of that period. As this sort of vulgar ornamentation has once prevailed, let us protect ourselves against its possible recurrence. [93] While making this passing allusion to the theory that the origin of all Gothic decoration is mainly founded on the motive of interlacing stems and foliage, I wish to guard myself against being supposed
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99  
100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Charles

 

Ornament

 

flatness

 
perspective
 
motive
 

decoration

 

picture

 

theory

 
Chinese
 

design


eleventh
 

Manual

 

Redgrave

 

century

 

Tissus

 

Ornamentation

 

Auberville

 

original

 
objects
 

pictorial


shadows

 

differs

 

Semper

 

relief

 

mentioned

 

textile

 

recurrence

 

making

 

passing

 

prevailed


protect

 

allusion

 
origin
 

supposed

 

foliage

 

Gothic

 

founded

 
interlacing
 
ornamentation
 

England


Buccaneers

 
reflected
 

introduced

 

idolatrous

 
carvings
 
embroideries
 

period

 

vulgar

 

Renaissance

 

Italian