FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197  
198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   >>   >|  
berately suppressed would be highly improper. The Northcliffe Press had also maybe failed to become acquainted with the great increase that had taken place in the forces at the front, as compared to the strength of the original Expeditionary Force which had provided the basis of calculation for munitions in pre-war days, an increase for which there was no counterpart in the armies of our Allies or of our enemies. Or the effect that this must have in accentuating munitions shortage may have been overlooked, obvious as it was. Be that as it may, the country readily accepted the story as it stood, and was in consequence grievously misinformed as to the merits of the question. The real truth has only leaked out since the cessation of hostilities, and it is not generally known now.[6] [Footnote 6: So late as the 21st of April 1920 _The Times_ included the following passage in a leading article: "Every gunner officer on the Western Front during the winter of 1914-15 knows that there was a grave and calamitous deficiency of shells, and that no satisfactory attempt was made to rectify it until the matter was exposed in _The Times_." Dragging in the "gunner officer" at the front (who could not possibly tell what steps were being taken to rectify the deficiency) does not alter the fact that this passage amounts to an accusation that no satisfactory attempt was made to rectify the deficiency until after the Northcliffe Press stunt. _The Times_ may have been so ill-informed as to the actual facts in 1915 as to suppose that this was true. _The Times_ cannot have been so ill-informed as to the actual facts in 1920 as to suppose that it was true.] After the Government had decided to create a Munitions Ministry with Mr. Lloyd George at its head, one of the first incidents that occurred was an unsavoury one. In the course of the discussions in the House of Commons over the Bill setting up this new Department of State, Sir H. Dalziel, a newspaper proprietor and a politician of long standing, delivered on the 1st of July a violent diatribe directed against Sir S. von Donop, the Master-General of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197  
198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

deficiency

 

rectify

 

officer

 

passage

 

suppose

 

actual

 
informed
 
attempt
 

satisfactory

 

gunner


Northcliffe

 

increase

 

munitions

 

Government

 

Ministry

 

Munitions

 

create

 

decided

 

accusation

 
possibly

exposed

 

Dragging

 

amounts

 

George

 

standing

 

delivered

 

politician

 

Dalziel

 
newspaper
 

proprietor


violent

 

Master

 

General

 

diatribe

 

directed

 
unsavoury
 

occurred

 

incidents

 

matter

 

acquainted


discussions

 
Department
 

setting

 

Commons

 

compared

 

suppressed

 
consequence
 

accepted

 

country

 
readily