FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122  
123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   >>   >|  
Persian. Nevertheless, it is anything but either Hebrew or Arabic. Similarity of political constitution, and its attendant spirit of independence, have given a political importance to both the Biluch and the Afghan. Each is but partially--very partially--British; and each became dependent upon Britain, not because they were the Afghans and Biluch of their own rugged countries, but because they were part and parcel of certain territories in India. It was on the Indus that they were conquered; and it as Indians that they are British. Four great patriarchs are the hypothetical progenitors of the four primary Afghan divisions--though it is uncertain whether any such quaternion be more of an historical reality than the four castes of Brahminism. Subordinate to these four heads is the division called _Ulus_ (_Ooloos_). A minuter knowledge of the Afghan affiliations--real or supposed--is to be gained by premising that _khail_ has much the same meaning as the Biluch _khoum_, so that it denotes a division of population which we may call _clan_, _tribe_, or _sept_; whilst the affix -_zye_, means _sons_ or _offspring_. Hence, _Eusof-zye_ is equivalent to what an Arab would call _Beni Yusuf_; a Greek, _Ioseph-idae_; or a Highland Gael, _MacJoseph_. All this is clear. When, however, we try to give precision to our nomenclature, and ask whether the _khail_ contains a number of -_zye_, or the -_zye_ a number of _khails_, difficulties begin. Sometimes the one, sometimes the other is the larger class. And a _khail_ in one case may be divided into groups ending in -_zye_; in others, a group denoted by -_zye_ may contain two or more _khails_. Each is a _generic_ or _specific_ designation as the case may be. However, to proceed to instances, the following groups of Afghans may be constituted. 1. Three sections--the _Acco-zye_, the _Mulle-zye_, and the _Lawe-zye_--are subdivisions of the-- 2. _Eusof._--The Eusof and _Munder_ being branches of the-- 3. _Eusof-zye._--Now the _Eusof-zye_ is one out of four divisions of the-- 4. _Khukkhi._--The _Guggiani_, _Turcolani_, and _Mahomed-zye_, being the other three. 5. Lastly, the _Khukkhi_, the _Otman-khail_, the _Khyberi_, the _Bungush_, the _Khuttuk_ and, probably, some others form the _Berdurani_ Afghans. But as _Berdurani_ is a geographical, or political, rather than a tribual designation; as it is the name by which the _north_-eastern Afghans were known to the Moghuls;
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122  
123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Afghans
 
political
 
Biluch
 
Afghan
 

number

 

Khukkhi

 

khails

 

groups

 

divisions

 

division


designation

 

British

 

Berdurani

 

partially

 

MacJoseph

 

divided

 

Highland

 
Ioseph
 
ending
 

precision


nomenclature

 

difficulties

 
larger
 

Sometimes

 

Khyberi

 

Bungush

 
Khuttuk
 

Lastly

 

Guggiani

 
Turcolani

Mahomed

 
eastern
 

Moghuls

 

tribual

 
geographical
 

instances

 

constituted

 

proceed

 

However

 

generic


specific

 
sections
 
Munder
 

branches

 

subdivisions

 

denoted

 

denotes

 

parcel

 

territories

 
countries