FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   1867   1868  
1869   1870   1871   1872   1873   1874   1875   1876   1877   1878   1879   1880   1881   1882   1883   1884   1885   1886   1887   1888   1889   1890   1891   1892   1893   >>   >|  
and called the example "an excellently well conceived and well managed specimen of versification," counts many syllables long, which such a reading makes short, and he also divides all but the iambics in a way quite different from mine, thus: "Let us scan the first stanza. 'I s=aw | h~im =once | b~ef=ore As h~e | p=ass~ed | b=y th~e | d=oor, And ~a- | g=ain Th~e p=ave- | m~ent st=ones | r~es=ound As h~e | t=ott~ers | =o'er th~e | gr=ound W=ith h~is c=ane.' This," says he, "is the general scansion of the poem. We have first three iambuses. The second line shifts the _rhythm_ into the _trochaic_, giving us three trochees, with a caesura equivalent, in this case, to a trochee. The third line is a trochee and equivalent caesura."--POE'S NOTES UPON ENGLISH VERSE: _Pioneer_, p. 109. These quantities are the same as those by which the whole piece is made to consist of iambs and amphimacs. OBS. 3.--In its _rhythmical effect_ upon the ear, a supernumerary short syllable at the end of a line, may sometimes, perhaps, compensate for the want of such a syllable at the beginning of the next line, as may be seen in the fourth example above; but still it is unusual, and seems improper, to suppose such syllables to belong to the scansion of the subsequent line; for the division of lines, with their harmonic pauses, is greater than the division of feet, and implies that no foot can ever actually be split by it. Poe has suggested that the division into lines may be disregarded in scanning, and sometimes must be. He cites for an example the beginning of Byron's "Bride of Abydos,"--a passage which has been admired for its easy flow, and which, he says, has greatly puzzled those who have attempted to scan it. Regarding it as essentially anapestic tetrameter, yet as having some initial iambs, and the first and fifth lines dactylic, I shall here divide it accordingly, thus:-- "Kn=ow y~e th~e | l=and wh~ere th~e | c=ypr~ess ~and | m=yrtl~e Ar~e =em | -bl~ems ~of d=eeds | th~at ~are d=one | ~in th~eir cl=ime-- Where the rage | of the vul | -ture, the love | of the tur | -tle, Now melt | into soft | -ness, now mad | -den to crime? Know ye the | land of the | cedar and | vine. Where the flow'rs | ever blos | -som, the beams | ever shine, And the light | wings of Zeph | -yr, oppress'd | with perfume, Wax faint | o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   1867   1868  
1869   1870   1871   1872   1873   1874   1875   1876   1877   1878   1879   1880   1881   1882   1883   1884   1885   1886   1887   1888   1889   1890   1891   1892   1893   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

division

 
scansion
 

syllable

 

beginning

 

equivalent

 
caesura
 
trochee
 
syllables
 

scanning

 

puzzled


greatly

 
admired
 

passage

 
Abydos
 

implies

 
greater
 

oppress

 

harmonic

 

pauses

 

suggested


disregarded

 
tetrameter
 

perfume

 
Regarding
 

essentially

 

anapestic

 
initial
 
divide
 

dactylic

 

attempted


general

 

counts

 
reading
 

versification

 

specimen

 
called
 

excellently

 

conceived

 

managed

 
divides

stanza

 

iambics

 

supernumerary

 

effect

 

rhythmical

 

amphimacs

 
compensate
 

improper

 
suppose
 

belong