FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   1685   1686   1687   1688   1689   1690   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696  
1697   1698   1699   1700   1701   1702   1703   1704   1705   1706   1707   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   >>   >|  
to designate a question. RULE I.--QUESTIONS DIRECT. Questions expressed directly as such, if finished, should always be followed by the note of interrogation; as, "Was it possible that virtue so exalted should be erected upon injustice? that the proudest and the most ambitious of mankind should be the great master and accomplished pattern of humility? that a doctrine so pure as the Gospel should be the work of an uncommissioned pretender? that so perfect a system of morals should be established on blasphemy?"--_Jerningham's Essay_, p. 81. "In life, can love be bought with gold? Are friendship's pleasures to be sold?"--_Johnson_. RULE II.--QUESTIONS UNITED. When two or more questions are united in one compound sentence, the comma, semicolon, or dash, is sometimes used to separate them, and the eroteme occurs after the last only; as, 1. "When--under what administration--under what exigencies of war or peace--did the Senate ever before deal with such a measure in such a manner? Never, sir, never."--_D. Webster, in Congress_, 1846. 2. "Canst thou, and honour'd with a Christian name, Buy what is woman-born, and feel no shame; Trade in the blood of innocence, and plead Expedience as a warrant for the deed?"--_Cowper_. 3. "Truths would you teach, or save a sinking land? All fear, none aid you, and few understand."--_Pope_. RULE III.--QUESTIONS INDIRECT. When a question is mentioned, but not put directly as a question, it loses both the quality and the sign of interrogation; as, "The Cyprians asked me _why I wept_."--_Murray_. OBSERVATIONS. OBS. 1.--The value of the eroteme as a sign of pause, is stated very differently by different grammarians; while many of the vast multitude, by a strange oversight, say nothing about it. It is unquestionably _variable_, like that of the dash, or of the ecphoneme. W. H. Wells says, "The comma requires a momentary pause; the semicolon, a pause somewhat longer than the comma; the colon, a pause somewhat longer than the semicolon; and the period, a full stop. The note of interrogation, or the note of exclamation, _may take the place of_ EITHER _of these_, and accordingly requires a pause of the same length as the point for which it is substituted."--_Wells's School Gram._, p. 175. This appears to be accurate in idea, though perhaps hardly so in language. Lindley Murray has stated it thus: "The interrogation and exclamati
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   1685   1686   1687   1688   1689   1690   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696  
1697   1698   1699   1700   1701   1702   1703   1704   1705   1706   1707   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

interrogation

 
semicolon
 

QUESTIONS

 

question

 

eroteme

 
requires
 
stated
 
longer
 

directly

 

Murray


OBSERVATIONS

 
Cyprians
 

understand

 
sinking
 

Truths

 
Expedience
 

warrant

 

Cowper

 

mentioned

 

INDIRECT


quality

 
substituted
 

School

 
length
 

EITHER

 

Lindley

 
language
 
exclamati
 

appears

 

accurate


exclamation

 

oversight

 
strange
 

multitude

 

grammarians

 
innocence
 

unquestionably

 

momentary

 

period

 
variable

ecphoneme

 

differently

 

morals

 

system

 

established

 

blasphemy

 
perfect
 

pretender

 
Gospel
 

uncommissioned