FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   1378   1379   1380   1381   1382   1383   1384   1385   1386   1387   1388   1389   1390   1391   1392  
1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409   1410   1411   1412   1413   1414   1415   1416   1417   >>   >|  
and yet it may not be right, to suppose both particles to be often equally good. Undoubtedly, a negation may be repeated in English without impropriety, and that in several different ways: as, "There is _no_ living, _none_, if Bertram be away."--_Beauties of Shak._, p. 3. "Great men are _not_ always wise, _neither_ do the aged [always] understand judgement."--_Job_, xxxii, 9. "Will he esteem thy riches? _no, not_ gold, _nor_ all the forces of strength."--_Job_, xxxiv. 19. Some sentences, too, require _or_, and others _nor_, even when a negative occurs in a preceding clause; as, "There was _none_ of you that convinced Job, _or_ that answered his words."--_Job_, xxxii, 12. "How much less to him that accepteth _not_ the persons of princes _nor_ regardeth the rich more than the poor."--_Job_, xxxiv, 19. "This day is holy unto the Lord your God; mourn _not, nor_ weep."--_Neh._, viii, 9. "Men's behaviour should be like their apparel, _not_ too straight _or_ point-de-vise, but free for exercise."--_Ld. Bacon_. Again, the mere repetition of a simple negative is, on some occasions, more agreeable than the insertion of any connective; as, "There is _no_ darkness, _nor_ shadow of death, where the workers of iniquity may hide themselves."--_Job_, xxxiv, 22. Better: "There is _no_ darkness, _no_ shadow of death, _wherein_ the workers of iniquity may hide themselves." "_No_ place _nor any_ object appears to him void of beauty."--_Murray's Key_, 8vo, p. 255. Better: "_No_ place, _no_ object, appears to him void of beauty." That passage from Milton which Burn supposes to be faulty, and that expression of Addison's which Churchill dislikes, are, in my opinion, not incorrect as they stand; though, doubtless, the latter admits of the variation proposed. In the former, too, _or_ may twice be changed to _nor_, where the following nouns are nominatives; but to change it throughout, would not be well, because the other nouns are objectives governed by _of_: "Seasons return, but _not_ to me returns Day, _nor_ the sweet approach of ev'n _or_ morn, _Nor_ sight of vernal bloom, _or_ summer's rose, _Or_ flocks, _or_ herds, _or_ human face divine." OBS. 22.--_Ever_ and _never_ are directly opposite to each other in sense, and yet they are very frequently confounded and misapplied, and that by highly respectable writers; as, "Seldom, or _never_ can we expect," &c.--_Blair's Lectures_, p. 305. "And seldom, or _ever_, did any one ris
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   1378   1379   1380   1381   1382   1383   1384   1385   1386   1387   1388   1389   1390   1391   1392  
1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409   1410   1411   1412   1413   1414   1415   1416   1417   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
negative
 

beauty

 
shadow
 
darkness
 

Better

 

iniquity

 

workers

 

object

 

appears

 
doubtless

admits

 

changed

 
nominatives
 
proposed
 
variation
 

Milton

 
passage
 
Murray
 

supposes

 

faulty


opinion

 

incorrect

 

dislikes

 

expression

 

Addison

 
Churchill
 
misapplied
 

confounded

 

highly

 

respectable


writers
 
frequently
 

directly

 

opposite

 
Seldom
 
seldom
 

expect

 

Lectures

 

divine

 
return

returns

 

approach

 

Seasons

 
governed
 

objectives

 
flocks
 

summer

 

vernal

 

change

 

esteem