FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   1378   1379   1380   1381   1382   1383   1384   1385   1386   1387   1388   1389  
1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409   1410   1411   1412   1413   1414   >>   >|  
rved by Priestley, and after him by Lindley Murray, from whom others again have copied the remark: "Sometimes the particles _or_ and _nor_, may, either of them, be used with nearly equal propriety; [as,] 'The king, whose character was not sufficiently vigorous, _nor_ decisive, assented to the measure.'--_Hume. Or_ would perhaps have been better, but _nor_ seems to repeat the negation in the former part of the sentence, and therefore gives more emphasis to the expression."-- _Priestley's Gram._, p. 138; _Murray's_, i, 212; _Ingersoll's_, 268; _R. C. Smith's_, 177. The conjunction _or_ might doubtless have been used in this sentence, but _not with the same meaning_ that is now conveyed; for, if that connective had been employed, the adjective _decisive_ would have been qualified by the adverb _sufficiently_, and would have seemed only an alternative for the former epithet, _vigorous_. As the text now stands, it not only implies a distinction between vigour of character and decision of character, but denies the latter to the king absolutely, the former, with qualification. If the author had meant to suggest such a distinction, and also to qualify his denial of both, he ought to have said--"not sufficiently vigorous, _nor sufficiently_ decisive." With this meaning, however, he might have used _neither_ for _not_; or with the former, he might have used _or_ for _nor_, had he transposed the terms--"was not decisive, _or_ sufficiently vigorous." OBS. 17.--In the tenth edition of John Burn's Practical Grammar, published at Glasgow, in 1810, are the following suggestions: "It is not uncommon to find the conjunctions _or_ and _nor_ used indiscriminately; but if there be any real distinction in the proper application of them, it is to be wished that it were settled. It is attempted thus:--Let the conjunction _or_ be used simply to connect the members of a sentence, or to mark distribution, opposition, or choice, without any preceding negative particle; and _nor_ to mark the subsequent part of a negative sentence, with some negative particle in the preceding part of it. Examples of OR: 'Recreation of one kind _or_ other is absolutely necessary to relieve the body _or_ mind from too constant attention to labour or study.'--'After this life, succeeds a state of rewards _or_ punishments.'--'Shall I come to you with a rod, _or_ in love?' Examples of NOR: 'Let no man be too confident, _nor_ too diffident of his own abilities.'--'Never ca
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   1378   1379   1380   1381   1382   1383   1384   1385   1386   1387   1388   1389  
1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409   1410   1411   1412   1413   1414   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
sufficiently
 

vigorous

 
decisive
 
sentence
 

negative

 

character

 

distinction

 

absolutely

 

Murray

 
meaning

particle

 

Examples

 
preceding
 
conjunction
 
Priestley
 

assented

 
attempted
 
wished
 

application

 

simply


settled

 

members

 

choice

 

opposition

 

distribution

 
proper
 
propriety
 

connect

 

published

 

Glasgow


Grammar
 
Practical
 

edition

 

conjunctions

 
indiscriminately
 
uncommon
 

suggestions

 

measure

 

subsequent

 
rewards

punishments

 

abilities

 

diffident

 
confident
 

succeeds

 
relieve
 

Recreation

 

labour

 

attention

 

constant