FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259  
1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   >>   >|  
d, in the other instances, it is not properly the verb _do_, that is the substitute, but rather the word that follows it--or perhaps, both. For, since every action consists in _doing something_ or in _doing somehow_, this general verb _do_, with _this, that, it, thus_, or _so_, to identify the action, may assume the import of many a longer phrase. But care must be taken not to substitute this verb for any term to which it is not equivalent; as, "The _a_ is certainly to be sounded as the English _do_."--_Walker's Dict., w. A_. Say, "as the English _sound it_;" for _do_ is here absurd, and grossly solecistical. "The duke had not behaved with that loyalty with which he ought to have _done_."--_Lowth's Gram._, p. 111; _Murray's_, i, 212; _Churchill's_, 355; _Fisk's_, 137; _Ingersoll's_, 269. Say, "with which he ought to have _behaved_;" for, to have _done_ with loyalty is not what was meant--far from it. Clarendon wrote the text thus: "The Duke had not behaved with that loyalty, _as_ he ought to have done." This should have been corrected, not by changing _"as"_ to _"with which"_, but by saying--"with that loyalty _which_ he ought to have _observed;"_ or, "_which would have become him"_. OBS. 19.--It is little to the credit of our grammarians, to find so many of them thus concurring in the same obvious error, and even making bad English worse. The very examples which have hitherto been given to prove that _do_ may be a substitute for other verbs, are _none of them in point_, and all of them have been constantly and shamefully _misinterpreted._ Thus: "They [_do_ and _did_] sometimes also supply the place of _another verb_, and make the repetition of it, in the same or a subsequent sentence, unnecessary: as, 'You attend not to your studies as he _does_;' (i. e. as he _attends_, &c.) 'I shall come if I can; but if I _do not_, please to excuse me;' (i. e. if I _come_ not.)"--_L. Murray's Gram._, Vol. i, p. 88; _R. C. Smith's_, 88; _Ingersoll's_, 135; _Fisk's_, 78; _A. Flint's_, 41; _Hiley's_, 30. This remark, but not the examples, was taken from _Lowths Gram._, p. 41. Churchill varies it thus, and retains Lowth's example: "It [i. e., _do_] is used also, to supply the _place of another verb_, in order to avoid the repetition of it: as, 'He _loves_ not plays, As thou _dost_, Antony.' SHAKS."--_New Gram._, p. 96. Greenleaf says, "To prevent the repetition of _one or more verbs_, in the same, or [a] following sentence, we frequentl
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259  
1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

loyalty

 

behaved

 

English

 

substitute

 

repetition

 
supply
 

Churchill

 

Murray

 

action

 
Ingersoll

examples

 

sentence

 
subsequent
 

shamefully

 

misinterpreted

 

constantly

 

studies

 

attend

 

unnecessary

 
attends

Antony

 

Greenleaf

 

frequentl

 

prevent

 

excuse

 

retains

 

varies

 
Lowths
 

remark

 

corrected


equivalent

 

phrase

 

sounded

 

Walker

 
absurd
 

grossly

 

solecistical

 

longer

 
import
 
instances

properly

 

general

 

identify

 

assume

 

consists

 

grammarians

 

concurring

 
credit
 

obvious

 

hitherto