FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1234   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258  
1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   >>   >|  
oy."--_Bible_. That is,--"and he _can_ destroy." "Virtue _may be assail'd_, but never _hurt_, _Surpris'd_ by unjust force, but not _inthrall'd_."--_Milton_. "Mortals whose pleasures are their only care, First wish to be _imposed on_, and then _are_."--_Cowper_. OBS. 17.--From the foregoing examples, it may be seen, that the complex and divisible structure of the English moods and tenses, produces, when verbs are connected together, a striking peculiarity of construction in our language, as compared with the nearest corresponding construction in Latin or Greek. For we can connect different auxiliaries, participles, or principal verbs, without repeating, and apparently without connecting, the other parts of the mood or tense. And although it is commonly supposed that these parts are necessarily understood wherever they are not repeated, there are sentences, and those not a few, in which we cannot express them, without inserting also an additional nominative, and producing distinct clauses; as, "_Should_ it not _be taken_ up and _pursued_?"--_Dr. Chalmers_. "Where thieves _do_ not _break_ through nor _steal_."--_Matt._, vi, 20. "None present _could_ either _read_ or _explain_ the writing-."--_Wood's Dict._, Vol. i, p. 159. Thus we sometimes make a single auxiliary an index to the mood and tense of more than one verb. OBS. 18.--The verb _do_, which is sometimes an auxiliary and sometimes a principal verb, is thought by some grammarians to be also fitly made a _substitute_ for other verbs, as a pronoun is for nouns; but this doctrine has not been taught with accuracy, and the practice under it will in many instances be found to involve a solecism. In this kind of substitution, there must either be a true ellipsis of the principal verb, so that _do_ is only an auxiliary; or else the verb _do_, with its _object_ or _adverb_, if it need one, must exactly correspond to an action described before; so that to speak of _doing this_ or _thus_, is merely the shortest way of repeating the idea: as, "He _loves_ not plays, as thou _dost_. Antony."--_Shak._ That is, "as thou _dost love plays._" "This fellow is wise enough _to play the fool_; and, _to do that_ well, craves a kind of wit."--_Id._ Here, "_to do that_," is, "_to play the fool_." "I will not _do it_, if I find thirty there."--_Gen._, xviii, 30. Do what? Destroy the city, as had been threatened. Where _do_ is an auxiliary, there is no real substitution; an
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1234   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258  
1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

auxiliary

 

principal

 

construction

 

substitution

 

repeating

 
pronoun
 

substitute

 

practice

 

accuracy

 
taught

doctrine

 

grammarians

 
single
 

craves

 

thought

 

threatened

 

action

 

correspond

 

shortest

 
adverb

object

 

fellow

 

solecism

 

instances

 

involve

 

Antony

 

ellipsis

 
Destroy
 

thirty

 

pursued


English

 

structure

 

tenses

 

produces

 
divisible
 

complex

 

foregoing

 

examples

 
connected
 
nearest

compared

 

language

 

striking

 

peculiarity

 

Cowper

 

Surpris

 

unjust

 
assail
 

Virtue

 

destroy