FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640  
641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   >>   >|  
r Murray pretended to follow Lowth, and nearly all the rest copied Murray. Dr. Lowth says, "_Thy, my, her, our, your, their_, are pronominal adjectives; but _his_, (that is, _he's_,) _her's, our's, your's, their's_, have evidently the form of the possessive case: And, by analogy, _mine, thine_, may be esteemed of the same rank."--_Lowth's Gram._, p. 23.[208] But why did he not see, that by the same analogy, and also by the sense and meaning of the words, as well as by their distinctions of person, number, and gender, all the other six are entitled to "the same rank?" Are not the forms of _my, thy, her, our, your, their_, as fit to denote the relation of property, and to be called the possessive case, as _mine, thine, his_, or any others? In grammar, all needless distinctions are reprehensible. And where shall we find a more blamable one than this? It seems to have been based merely upon the false notion, that the possessive case of pronouns ought to be formed like that of nouns; whereas custom has clearly decided that they shall always be different: the former must never be written with an apostrophe; and the latter, never without it. Contrary to all good usage, however, the Doctor here writes "_her's, our's, your's, their's_," each with a needless apostrophe. Perhaps he thought it would serve to strengthen his position; and help to refute what some affirmed, that all these words are adjectives. OBS. 7.--Respecting _mine, thine_, and _his_, Lowth and L. Murray disagree. The latter will have them to be sometimes "_possessive pronouns_," and sometimes "_possessive cases_." An admirable distinction this for a great author to make! too slippery for even the inventor's own hold, and utterly unintelligible to those who do not know its history! In short, these authors disagree also concerning _my, thy, her, our, your, their_; and where two leaders of a party are at odds with each other, and each is in the wrong, what is to be expected from their followers? Perceiving that Lowth was wrong in calling these words "_pronominal adjectives_," Murray changed the term to "_possessive pronouns_," still retaining the class entire; and accordingly taught, in his early editions, that, "There are _four kinds_ of pronouns, viz., the personal, _the possessive, the_ relative, and _the_ adjective pronouns."--_Murray's Gram._, 2d Edition, p. 37. "The Possessive Pronouns are such as principally relate to possession or property. There are seven of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640  
641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

possessive

 

Murray

 

pronouns

 
adjectives
 
distinctions
 

needless

 
property
 

disagree

 

analogy

 

pronominal


apostrophe
 

affirmed

 

refute

 

unintelligible

 

utterly

 
inventor
 

slippery

 

admirable

 

distinction

 
author

Respecting

 
calling
 

personal

 

relative

 

editions

 

taught

 

adjective

 
principally
 

relate

 

possession


Pronouns

 

Edition

 

Possessive

 

entire

 

leaders

 

history

 

authors

 

expected

 

retaining

 

changed


position

 

followers

 

Perceiving

 

gender

 

entitled

 

number

 
person
 

meaning

 

grammar

 

reprehensible