FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641  
642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   >>   >|  
them; viz. _my, thy, his, her, our, your, their_. The possessives _his, mine, thine_, may be accounted either _possessive pronouns_, or the _possessive cases_ of their respective personal pronouns."--_Ib._, p. 40. He next idly demonstrates that these seven words may come before nouns of any number or case, without variation; then, forgetting his own distinction, adds, "When they are separated from the noun, all of them, except _his_, vary _their terminations_; as, this hat is _mine_, and the other is _thine_; those trinkets are _hers_; this house is _ours_, and that is _yours; theirs_ is more commodious than _ours_"--_Ib._, p. 40. Thus all his personal pronouns of the possessive case, he then made to be inflections of pronouns of _a different class!_ What are they now? Seek the answer under the head of that gross solecism, "_Adjective Pronouns_." You may find it in one half of our English grammars. OBS. 8.--Any considerable error in the classing of words, does not stand alone; it naturally brings others in its train. Murray's "_Adjective Pronouns_," (which he now subdivides into four little classes, _possessive, distributive, demonstrative_, and _indefinite_,) being all of them misnamed and misplaced in his etymology, have led both him and many others into strange errors in syntax. The _possessives only_ are "pronouns;" and these are pronouns of the possessive _case_. As such, they agree with the _antecedent_ nouns for which they stand, in _person, number_, and _gender_; and are governed, like all other possessives, by the nouns which follow them. The rest are _not pronouns_, but pronominal _adjectives_; and, as such, they relate to nouns expressed or understood _after them_. Accordingly, they have none of the above-mentioned qualities, except that the words _this_ and _that_ form the plurals _these_ and _those_. Or, if we choose to ascribe to a pronominal adjective all the properties of the noun understood, it is merely for the sake of brevity in parsing. The difference, then, between a "pronominal adjective" and an "adjective pronoun," should seem to be this; that the one is _an adjective_, and the other _a pronoun_: it is like the difference between a _horserace_ and a _racehorse_. What can be hoped from the grammarian who cannot discern it? And what can be made of rules and examples like the following? "Adjective _pronouns_ must agree, in number, with _their substantives_: as, '_This_ book, _these_ books; _that_ so
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641  
642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

pronouns

 

possessive

 

adjective

 
Adjective
 
possessives
 

number

 
pronominal
 

difference

 

personal

 

Pronouns


understood
 

pronoun

 

relate

 

adjectives

 

expressed

 
antecedent
 

strange

 

errors

 

etymology

 
syntax

follow

 
governed
 

gender

 

person

 

grammarian

 

racehorse

 

horserace

 
discern
 

substantives

 

examples


parsing

 

brevity

 

plurals

 

qualities

 

mentioned

 

Accordingly

 

misplaced

 

properties

 

choose

 

ascribe


grammars

 

separated

 

terminations

 

forgetting

 

distinction

 

trinkets

 
commodious
 

variation

 

accounted

 

respective