FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825  
826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   >>   >|  
rms. 3. Every citizen has a right to take with him into the Territory any article of property which the Constitution of the United States recognizes as property. 4. The Constitution of the United States recognizes slaves as property, and pledges the Federal Government to protect it. And Congress cannot exercise any more authority over property of that description than it may constitutionally exercise over property of any other kind. 5. The act of Congress, therefore, prohibiting a citizen of the United States from taking with him his slaves when he removes to the Territory in question to reside, is an exercise of authority over private property which is not warranted by the Constitution--and the removal of the plaintiff, by his owner, to that Territory, gave him no title to freedom. V. 1. The plaintiff himself acquired no title to freedom by being taken, by his owner, to Rock Island, in Illinois, and brought back to Missouri. This court has heretofore decided that the _status_ or condition of a person of African descent depended on the laws of the State in which he resided. 2. It has been settled by the decisions of the highest court in Missouri, that by the laws of that State, a slave does not become entitled to his freedom, where the owner takes him to reside in a State where slavery is not permitted, and afterwards brings him back to Missouri. Conclusion. It follows that it is apparent upon the record that the court below erred in its judgment on the plea in abatement, and also erred in giving judgment for the defendant, when the exception shows that the plaintiff was not a citizen of the United States. And as the Circuit Court had no jurisdiction, either in the case stated in the plea in abatement, or in the one stated in the exception, its judgment in favor of the defendant is erroneous, and must be reversed. THE FUGITIVE SLAVE LAW. BY REV. CHARLES HODGE, D.D. OF NEW JERSEY. THE FUGITIVE SLAVE LAW. NOTE.--We have affixed, by way of comment to "the decision of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case," the following able paper from the pen of Prof. Hodge. It lucidly explains the source and sanction of Civil Government, and deduces therefrom the duties and responsibilities of the governed.--ED. * * * * * Alleged Immorality of the Law answered--Duty of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825  
826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

property

 

States

 
United
 

exercise

 

Missouri

 

freedom

 

plaintiff

 
Territory
 

citizen

 

judgment


Constitution

 

slaves

 

Government

 

reside

 
abatement
 

defendant

 

authority

 

Congress

 

recognizes

 

stated


exception

 

FUGITIVE

 
reversed
 
Circuit
 
jurisdiction
 

erroneous

 
giving
 

decision

 
sanction
 
deduces

source
 

explains

 
lucidly
 
therefrom
 

duties

 

answered

 
Immorality
 
Alleged
 

responsibilities

 
governed

JERSEY

 

CHARLES

 

affixed

 

Supreme

 

comment

 

descent

 
prohibiting
 

taking

 
removes
 

question