FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285  
286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   >>   >|  
A. Being the master of the three states, it is the knowledge of the three states, as existing in the present, past and future.** ------- * That is to say, flits from birth to birth. ** It is the stable basis upon which the three states arise and disappear. ------- Q. How is the spirit different from the five sheaths? A. This is being illustrated by an example:--"This is my cow," "this is my calf," "this is my son or daughter," "this is my wife," "this is my anandamaya sheath," and so on*--the spirit can never be connected with these concepts; it is different from and witness of them all. For it is said in the Upanishad--[The spirit is] "naught of sound, of touch, of form, or colour, of taste, or of smell; it is everlasting, having no beginning or end, superior [in order of subjectivity] to Prakriti (differentiated matter); whoever correctly understands it as such attains mukti (liberation)." The spirit has also been called (above) sat, chit, and ananda. Q. What is meant by its being sat (presence)? A. Existing unchanged in the three divisions of time and uninfluenced by anything else. Q. What by being chit (consciousness)? A. Manifesting itself without depending upon anything else, and containing the germ of everything in itself. Q. What by being ananda (bliss)? A. The ne plus ultra of bliss. Whoever knows without doubt and apprehension of its being otherwise, the self as being one with Brahma or spirit, which is eternal, non-dual and unconditioned, attains moksha (liberation from conditioned existence.) -------- * The "heresy of individuality," or attavada of the Buddhists. -------- Was Writing Known Before Panini? I am entrusted with the task of putting together some facts which would support the view that the art of writing was known in India before the time of our grammarian--the Siva-taught Panini. Professor Max Muller has maintained the contrary opinion ever since 1856, and has the approbation of other illustrious Western scholars. Stated briefly, their position is that the entire absence of any mention of "writing, reading, paper, or pen" in the Vedas, or during the whole of the Brahmana period, and the almost, if not quite, as complete silence as to them throughout the Sutra period, "lead us to suppose that even then [the Sutra period], though the art of writing began to be known, the whole literature of India was preserved by oral tradition only." ("H
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285  
286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
spirit
 

period

 

writing

 

states

 

ananda

 

Panini

 

attains

 

liberation

 

support

 
Before

conditioned

 

existence

 

heresy

 

individuality

 

moksha

 

unconditioned

 

eternal

 
attavada
 
Buddhists
 
entrusted

putting

 

grammarian

 

Writing

 

scholars

 

complete

 

silence

 

Brahmana

 

preserved

 
tradition
 

literature


suppose
 
reading
 

opinion

 
approbation
 
contrary
 
maintained
 

taught

 

Professor

 
Muller
 
illustrious

entire
 

absence

 

mention

 
position
 
Western
 

Brahma

 

Stated

 

briefly

 

uninfluenced

 

sheath