to Money, they have none, Gold or Silver: About 50 Years ago
they had some coined at _Boston_; but there's not enough now for
Retailers. All Payments are in Province Bills, even so low as _Half
a Crown_; thus every Man's Money is his Pocket Book. This makes the
Course of Exchange so exorbitant, that 100_l._ in _London_ made out
lately 225_l._ in _New-England_; and if a Merchant sells his Goods
from _England_ at 220_l._ Advance upon 100_l._ in the Invoice, he
would be a Loser by the Bargain, considering the incidental Charges
on his Invoice.'
So that after all, they had as great 'ups and downs' of old as do we of
the present day.
Apropos of the old book in question, it abounds in quaint bits of
information, given in a dry, free and easy style seldom found at the
present day in any work of the kind. Thus it tells us, among the
anecdotes of ELLIOT the missionary, that an Indian in a religious
conference asked how GOD could create man in his own image, since
according to the second commandment it was forbidden to make any such
image?
'To qualify him for the Work he was going about, Mr _Elliot_ learnt the
_Indian_ Language as barbarous as can come out of the Mouth of Man, as
will be seen by these Instances:
'_Nummatchekodtantamoonganunnonash_, is in English, _Our Lusts_; a Word
that the Reverend Mr _Elliot_ must often have occasion to make Use of.
As long as it is, we meet with a longer still:
'_Kummogkodonattoottummoooctiteaongannunonash_, meaning Our Question.
'_Gannunonash_' seems to be 'our,' because we find it in the End of the
First Word, as well as the second, * * and this appears again in another
Word:
'_Noowomantammooonkanunnonash_, 'Our Loves.'
'The longest of these _Indian_ Words is to be measured by the Inch, and
reaches to near half a Foot; and if Mr _Elliot_ did put as many of these
Words in a Sermon of his, as Mr _Peters_ put _English_ Words in one of
his Sermons, everyone of them must have made a sizeable Book and have
taken up three or four Hours in utterance.'
The Peters referred to was the celebrated Hugh Peters, Cromwell's
chaplain. Our author vindicates this clergyman from certain scandalous
charges, declaring that he had asked of his daughter, Miss Peters, if
they were so, which she had utterly denied! Less credulous is he as
regarded 'William Pen' (with whom he seems to have been on terms of
great personal intimacy), since he hints very broadl
|