FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298  
299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   >>   >|  
t first in mind might have called up any one of several facts, having been linked with each of them in past {379} experience; and we want to know why it recalls one of these facts rather than the rest. The factors of advantage in recall are the factors that determine the strength of linkage between two facts; and they are: the _frequency_ with which the linkage has occurred; the _recency_ with which it has occurred; and the _intensity_ with which it has occurred. If I have frequently observed the connection of two facts, the linkage between them is strong; if I have recently observed their connection, the linkage between them is strong till the "recency value" dies away; and if my observation of the connection of the two facts was a vivid experience, or intense reaction, then, also, the linkage between them is strong. If these three factors of advantage work together in favor of the same response, then that response is sure to occur; but if the three factors pull different ways, we should have to figure out the balance of advantage before we could predict which of the possible responses would actually be made. Naturally enough, even the skilful psychologist is often unable to strike the balance between the three factors. He does know, however, and all of us know in a practical way, that strong recency value offsets a lot of frequency; so that a mere vague allusion to a very recent topic of conversation can be depended on to recall the right facts to the hearer's mind, even though they lie outside of his habitual line of interest. "James", by virtue of frequency, means your brother or friend; but after the lecturer has been talking about the psychologist James, repetition of this name infallibly recalls the psychologist to mind. Besides frequency, recency and intensity, there is, indeed, another factor to be taken into account; and that is the {380} present state of the subject's mind. If he is unhappy, unpleasant associations have the advantage; if happy, pleasant. If he is absorbed in a given matter, facts related to that matter have the advantage. Frequency, recency and intensity summarize the _history_ of associations, and measure their strength as dependent on their history; but the present state of mind is an additional directive factor, and when it has much to do with recall, we speak of directed or controlled association. Before we pass to the topic of controlled association, however, there is an
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298  
299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

advantage

 

factors

 
linkage
 

recency

 
frequency
 

strong

 

intensity

 
occurred
 

recall

 

psychologist


connection

 

response

 

observed

 
balance
 

association

 

associations

 
present
 

recalls

 

matter

 

experience


strength
 

factor

 
controlled
 
history
 

brother

 
repetition
 

talking

 

lecturer

 

friend

 

interest


hearer

 

depended

 

conversation

 
virtue
 

habitual

 

subject

 

directed

 

Before

 

recent

 

related


measure

 

additional

 
summarize
 

directive

 

Frequency

 

absorbed

 

pleasant

 

Besides

 

infallibly

 
account