FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237  
238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   >>   >|  
ier, Du Bellay had, while on an embassy, set forth his royal master's pretended convictions in favor of the Reformation with so much verisimilitude as to alarm the papal nuncio, who dreaded the effect of his speeches upon the Protestants. "Non e piccola murmoration qui en Corte, ch'l Orator Francese _facea piu che l'officio suo richiede in animar Lutherani_." Aleander to Sanga, Ratisbon, July 2, 1532, Vatican MSS., Laemmer, 141.] [Footnote 380: Sleidan, De statu rel. et reipubl., lib. ix., ad annum 1535. The Jesuit Maimbourg rejects the secret conference of Du Bellay as apocryphal, in view of Francis's persecution of the Protestants at Paris, and his declaration of January 21st. But Sleidan's statement is fully substantiated by an extant memorandum by Spalatin, who was present on the occasion (printed in Seckendorff, Gerdes, iv. 68-73 Doc., and Bretschneider, ii. 1014). It receives additional confirmation from a letter of the Nuncio Morone to Pope Paul III., Vienna, Dec. 26, 1536 (Vatican MSS., Laemmer, 178). Morone received from Doctor Matthias, Vice-Chancellor of the Empire, an account of Francis's recent offer to the German Protestants "_di condescendere nelle loro opinioni,_" on condition of their renouncing obedience to the emperor. He reserved only two points of doctrine as requiring discussion: the sacrifice of the mass, and the authority and primacy of the Pope. The Protestants rejected the interested proposal of the royal convert.] [Footnote 381: The authorship of this interesting document, and the way it reached its destination, are equally unknown. It is published--for the first time, I believe--in Baum, Cunitz, and Reuss, Opera Calvini (1872), x. part ii. 55, 56.] [Footnote 382: Senatus Argentoratensis Francisco Regi, July 3, 1536, ibid., x. 57-61.] [Footnote 383: Senatus Turicensis Francisco Regi, July 13, 1536, ibid., x. 61.] [Footnote 384: Edict of Lyons, May 31, 1536, Herminjard, iv. 192.] [Footnote 385: Francois I^er aux Conseils de Zurich, Berne, Bale et Strasbourg, Compiegne, Feb. 20, and Feb. 23, 1537, Basle MSS., ibid., iv. 191-193. Cf. the documents, mostly inedited, iv. 70, 96, 150.] [Footnote 386: Le Conseil de Berne au Conseil de Bale, March 15, 1537, ibid., iv. 202, 203, Sleidan (Strasb. ed. of 1555), lib x. fol. 163 _verso_. It must, however, be remarked that the "evangelical cities" would not take the rebuff as decisive, and, within a few months, were again writing to Francis i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237  
238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Protestants

 

Sleidan

 

Francis

 

Vatican

 

Morone

 

Francisco

 

Senatus

 

Laemmer

 
Conseil

Bellay

 

authority

 

primacy

 

rejected

 

convert

 

proposal

 

interested

 
requiring
 
doctrine
 
points

discussion

 

sacrifice

 

Argentoratensis

 

destination

 

equally

 

unknown

 

published

 

Cunitz

 
Calvini
 

interesting


authorship
 
document
 

reached

 
Conseils
 
remarked
 
Strasb
 

evangelical

 

months

 
writing
 
decisive

cities
 

rebuff

 

Francois

 
Zurich
 
Herminjard
 

Strasbourg

 

Compiegne

 

inedited

 

documents

 

Turicensis