FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220  
221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   >>   >|  
en centuries for the postdiluvian stone period in Europe and Western Asia, a time quite sufficient in our view for all that part of it represented by such monuments as the Danish shell-heaps or the platform habitations of the Swiss lakes; leaving the remains of the prehistoric caverns and river gravels for the antediluvian period. A few facts in illustration of these points, and also of the Biblical history, may be mentioned here. We know perfectly that the early Chaldeans of the Euphratean valley were acquainted with the use of metals--bronze certainly, and at a very early date iron; yet flint knives and other implements of stone are found under circumstances which show that they were used in the palmy days of the Assyrian empire. The inhabitants of Egypt were acquainted with bronze and iron long before the date of the Exodus, yet the Egyptians used stone knives for some purposes up to a comparatively modern time. Joshua used stone knives for the purpose of circumcision; and according to Herodotus there were Ethiopians in the army of Xerxes who used stone-tipped arrows. If any antiquarian were to stumble on the "hill of the foreskins"--a mound under which were buried in all probability the multitudinous flint flakes used in the circumcision of the thousands of Israel--or the grave in which some of the Ethiopian auxiliaries of Xerxes were buried with their flint arrow-heads and javelins of antelopes' horn, how absurd would be the inference that these repositories were of the palaeolithic age. Nay, so late as 1870 a traveller was informed that the Bagos, a people of Abyssinia, still made and used stone hatchets and flint knives.[121] In Europe we find reason to believe that the Ligurians of Northwestern Italy were flint-folk of very rude type until they were conquered by the Gauls about 400 B.C.[122] Though the Gauls, Britons, and Germans of the age of Julius Caesar had iron weapons, yet it is evident that the metal was very scarce, and that bronze was more common; and in confirmation of this it is found that in the trenches before Alize, the Alesia of Caesar, where the final struggle of the Roman general with Vercingetorix took place, weapons of stone, bronze, and iron are intermixed. All over the more northern parts of Europe there is the best reason to believe that the use of stone and bronze continued to a much later period, and locally until long after the Christian era. It is clear that such facts as these must
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220  
221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

bronze

 

knives

 

period

 

Europe

 

Caesar

 

weapons

 
acquainted
 
buried
 

Xerxes

 

circumcision


reason

 

Ligurians

 

Northwestern

 

sufficient

 

conquered

 

hatchets

 

palaeolithic

 

repositories

 

inference

 
absurd

Abyssinia

 

people

 

traveller

 

informed

 

Britons

 

northern

 

intermixed

 

general

 
Vercingetorix
 

continued


Christian

 

locally

 

struggle

 

postdiluvian

 

centuries

 
evident
 

Western

 

Germans

 

Julius

 

scarce


Alesia

 
trenches
 

common

 

confirmation

 

Though

 

implements

 
habitations
 

leaving

 

caverns

 
prehistoric