FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  
at "it has done more for the happiness and enfranchisement of woman than any other creed" (Sir Lepel Griffin). 226. Q. _What did the Buddha teach about caste?_ A. That one does not become of any caste, whether Pariah, the lowest, or Brahmana the highest, by birth, but by deeds. "By deeds," said He, "one becomes an outcast, by deeds one becomes a Brahmana" (See _Vassala Sutta_). 227. Q. _Tell me a story to illustrate this?_ A. Ananda, passing by a well, was thirsty and asked Prakrti, a girl of the Matanga, or Pariah, caste, to give him water. She said she was of such low caste that he would become contaminated by taking water from her hand. But Ananda replied: "I ask not for caste but for water"; and the Matanga girl's heart was glad and she gave him to drink. The Buddha blessed her for it. 228. Q. _What did the Buddha say in "Vasala Sutta" about a man of the Pariah Sopaka caste?_ A. That by his merits he reached the highest fame; that many Khattiyas (Kshattriyas) and Brahmanas went to serve him; and that after death he was born in the Brahma-world: while there are many Brahmanas who for their evil deeds are born in hell. 229. Q. Does Buddhism teach the immortality of the soul? A. It considers "soul" to be a word used by the ignorant to express a false idea. If everything is subject to change, then man is included, and every material part of him must change. That which is subject to change is not permanent: so there can be no immortal survival of a changeful thing.[10] 230. Q. _What is so objectionable in this word "soul"?_ A. The idea associated with it that man can be an entity separated from all other entities, and from the existence of the whole of the Universe. This idea of separateness is unreasonable, not provable by logic, nor supported by science. 231. Q. _Then there is no separate "I," nor can we say "my" this or that?_ A. Exactly so. 232. Q. _If the idea of a separate human "soul" is to be rejected, what is it in man which gives him the impression of having a permanent personality?_ A. _Tanha_, or the unsatisfied desire for existence. The being having done that for which he must be rewarded or punished in future, and having _Tanha_, will have a rebirth through the influence of Karma. 233. Q. _What is it that is born?_ A. A new aggregation of Skandhas, or personality[11] caused by the last generative thought of the dying person. 234. Q.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Pariah
 

Buddha

 
change
 
Ananda
 

separate

 

Matanga

 

existence

 

Brahmanas

 

permanent

 
personality

subject

 

Brahmana

 
highest
 
immortal
 
survival
 

objectionable

 
changeful
 
thought
 

generative

 

person


included

 

entity

 

Skandhas

 

aggregation

 

caused

 
material
 
influence
 

future

 

punished

 

Exactly


rewarded
 
impression
 

desire

 

unsatisfied

 
rejected
 
Universe
 

entities

 

separateness

 

unreasonable

 
science

supported

 

rebirth

 

provable

 
separated
 

Khattiyas

 
illustrate
 

passing

 

Vassala

 

thirsty

 

contaminated