FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33  
34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>   >|  
+ Boucicault ending. Act II.--Jefferson. Act III.--Burke + Jefferson + ending suggested by Shakespeare's "King Lear." But, however the credit is distributed, Jefferson alone made the play as it lives in the memories of those who saw it. It grew by what it fed on, by accretions of rich imagination. Often times, Jefferson was scored for his glorification of the drunkard. He and Boucicault were continually discussing how best to circumvent the disagreeable aspects of _Rip's_ character. Even Winter and J. Rankin Towse are inclined to frown at the reprobate, especially by the side of Jefferson's interpretation of _Bob Acres_ or of _Caleb Plummer_. There is no doubt that, in their collaboration, Boucicault and Jefferson had many arguments about "Rip." Boucicault has left a record of the encounters: "Let us return to 1865," he wrote. "Jefferson was anxious to appear in London. All his pieces had been played there. The managers would not give him an appearance unless he could offer them a new play. He had a piece called 'Rip Van Winkle', but when submitted for their perusal, they rejected it. Still he was so desirous of playing _Rip_ that I took down Washington Irving's story and read it over. It was hopelessly undramatic. 'Joe', I said, 'this old sot is not a pleasant figure. He lacks romance. I dare say you made a fine sketch of the old beast, but there is no interest in him. He may be picturesque, but he is not dramatic. I would prefer to start him in a play as a young scamp, thoughtless, gay, just such a curly-head, good-humoured fellow as all the village girls would love, and the children and dogs would run after'. Jefferson threw up his hands in despair. It was totally opposed to his artistic preconception. But I insisted, and he reluctantly conceded. Well, I wrote the play as he plays it now. It was not much of a literary production, and it was with some apology that it was handed to him. He read it, and when he met me, I said: 'It is a poor thing, Joe'. 'Well', he replied, 'it is good enough for me'. It was produced. Three or four weeks afterward he called on me, and his first words were: 'You were right about making _Rip_ a young man. Now I could not conceive and play him in any other shape'." When finished, the manuscript was read to Ben Webster, the manager of the Haymarket Theatre, London, and to Charles Reade
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33  
34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Jefferson

 

Boucicault

 

ending

 

called

 

London

 
village
 

fellow

 

humoured

 

romance

 

figure


undramatic
 

pleasant

 

sketch

 

dramatic

 

prefer

 

picturesque

 

hopelessly

 
interest
 

children

 

thoughtless


insisted

 

making

 

produced

 

afterward

 

conceive

 

Haymarket

 
manager
 
Theatre
 

Charles

 
Webster

finished

 

manuscript

 

replied

 
artistic
 

opposed

 

preconception

 

reluctantly

 

totally

 
despair
 

conceded


handed

 

apology

 

literary

 

production

 

circumvent

 

disagreeable

 
aspects
 
character
 

discussing

 

scored