FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197  
198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   >>   >|  
a bridge of span l, both being considered for the present purpose to be uniform per ft. run. Let k(W_l+W_f) be the weight of main girders designed to carry W_l+W_f, but not their own weight in addition. Then W_g = (W_l+W_f)(k+k^2+k^3 ...) will be the weight of main girders to carry W_l+W_f and their own weight (Buck, _Proc. Inst. C.E._ lxvii. p. 331). Hence, W_g = (W_l+W_f)k/(1-k). Since in designing a bridge W_l+W_f is known, k(W_l+W_f) can be found from a provisional design in which the weight W_g is neglected. The actual bridge must have the section of all members greater than those in the provisional design in the ratio k/(1-k). Waddell (_De Pontibus_) gives the following convenient empirical relations. Let w_1, w_2 be the weights of main girders per ft. run for a live load p per ft. run and spans l_1, l_2. Then w_2/w_1 = 1/2 [l_2/l_1+(l_2/l_1)^2]. Now let w_1', w_2' be the girder weights per ft. run for spans l_1, l_2, and live loads p' per ft. run. Then w_2'/w_2 = 1/5(1+4p'/p) w_2'/w_1 = 1/10[l_2/l_1+(l_2/l_1)^2](1+4p'/p) A partially rational approximate formula for the weight of main girders is the following (Unwin, _Wrought Iron Bridges and Roofs_, 1869, p. 40):-- Let w = total live load per ft. run of girder; w_2 the weight of platform per ft. run; w_3 the weight of main girders per ft. run, all in tons; l = span in ft.; s = average stress in tons per sq. in. on gross section of metal; d = depth of girder at centre in ft.; r = ratio of span to depth of girder so that r = l/d. Then w_3 = (w_1+w_2)l^2/(Cds-l_2) = (w_1+w_2)lr/(Cs-lr), where C is a constant for any type of girder. It is not easy to fix the average stress s per sq. in. of gross section. Hence the formula is more useful in the form w = (w_1+w_2)l^2/(Kd-l^2) = (w_1+w_2)lr/(K-lr) where K = (w_1+w_2+w_3)lr/w_3 is to be deduced from the data of some bridge previously designed with the same working stresses. From some known examples, C varies from 1500 to 1800 for iron braced parallel or bowstring girders, and from 1200 to 1500 for similar girders of steel. K = 6000 to 7200 for iron and = 7200 to 9000 for steel bridges. iv. _Wind Pressure._--Much attention has been given to wind action since the disaster to the Tay bridge in 1879. As to the maximum wind pressure on small plates normal to the wind, there is not much doubt. Anemometer observations show that pressures of 30 lb per sq. ft. occur in storms annu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197  
198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

weight

 

girders

 
bridge
 

girder

 

section

 
formula
 

average

 
stress
 
weights
 

provisional


design
 

designed

 

pressure

 

examples

 

previously

 

working

 

stresses

 

storms

 

plates

 
Anemometer

normal
 

varies

 

deduced

 
Pressure
 
bridges
 

disaster

 

pressures

 
action
 

attention

 

bowstring


parallel
 

braced

 

observations

 
similar
 

maximum

 

approximate

 

neglected

 

actual

 

designing

 
Waddell

members

 
greater
 

purpose

 
uniform
 
present
 

considered

 
addition
 

Pontibus

 

platform

 
centre