FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   >>   >|  
breaking strength. Let k_{max.} be the breaking strength of the same bar when subjected to stresses varying from k_{max.} to k_{min.} alternately and repeated an indefinitely great number of times; k_{min.} is to be reckoned + if of the same kind as k_{max.} and - if of the opposite kind (tension or thrust). The range of stress is therefore k_{max.}-k_{min.}, if the stresses are both of the same kind, and k_{max.}+k_{min.}, if they are of opposite kinds. Let [Delta] = k_{max.} +- k_{min.} = the range of stress, where [Delta] is always positive. Then Woehler's results agree closely with the rule, k_{max.} = 1/2[Delta]+[root](K squared-n[Delta]K), where n is a constant which varies from 1.3 to 2 in various qualities of iron and steel. For ductile iron or mild steel it may be taken as 1.5. For a statical load, range of stress nil, [Delta] = 0, k_{max.} = K, the statical breaking stress. For a bar so placed that it is alternately loaded and the load removed, [Delta] = k_{max.} and k_{max.} = 0.6 K. For a bar subjected to alternate tension and compression of equal amount, [Delta] = 2 f_{max.} and k_{max.} = 0.33 K. The safe working stress in these different cases is k_{max.} divided by the factor of safety. It is sometimes said that a bar is "fatigued" by repeated straining. The real nature of the action is not well understood, but the word fatigue may be used, if it is not considered to imply more than that the breaking stress under repetition of loading diminishes as the range of variation increases. It was pointed out as early as 1869 (Unwin, _Wrought Iron Bridges and Roofs_) that a rational method of fixing the working stress, so far as knowledge went at that time, would be to make it depend on the ratio of live to dead load, and in such a way that the factor of safety for the live load stresses was double that for the dead load stresses. Let A be the dead load and B the live load, producing stress in a bar; [rho] = B/A the ratio of live to dead load; f_1 the safe working limit of stress for a bar subjected to a dead load only and f the safe working stress in any other case. Then f_1 (A+B)/(A+2B) = f_1(1+[rho])/(1+2[rho]). The following table gives values of f so computed on the assumption that f_1 = 71/2 tons per sq. in. for iron and 9 tons per sq. in. for steel. _Working Stress for combined Dead and Live Load. Factor of Safety twice as great for Live Load as for Dead Load._ ----------------------+--
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

stress

 

working

 
stresses
 

breaking

 

subjected

 
statical
 

safety

 
strength
 
factor
 

repeated


tension
 

opposite

 

alternately

 

knowledge

 

thrust

 

depend

 

rational

 

pointed

 

increases

 
Wrought

method
 

Bridges

 

fixing

 
double
 
indefinitely
 

assumption

 

values

 
computed
 

Working

 

Safety


Factor
 

combined

 

Stress

 
producing
 

number

 

varying

 

reckoned

 

variation

 

repetition

 
Woehler

results

 
positive
 

loaded

 
amount
 
compression
 

alternate

 
removed
 

squared

 

varies

 
constant