FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339  
340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   >>   >|  
. . . . 1119-20 1708] VII. Bahadur Shah-'Alam, Kutb-ud-din . . 1119 1707 VIII. Jahandar Shah, Mu'izz-ud-din . . 1124 1713 IX. Farrukhsiyar . . . . . 1124 1713 The question concerning the exact date from which the beginning of Aurangzeb's reign should be reckoned is obscured by the conflict of authorities and has given rise to much discussion. The results may be stated briefly as follow:-- Aurangzeb formally took possession of the throne in a garden outside Delhi on the 1st Zu'l Q'adah, A.H. 1068, July 31, A.D. 1658, but subsequently orders were passed to antedate the beginning of the reign to 1st Ramazan in the same year, equivalent to June 2, 1658. After the destruction of Shah Shuja, Aurangzeb returned to Delhi in May, A.D. 1659, and was again enthroned with full ceremonial on June 15, 1659 (= A.H. 1069). Some authors consequently assume the accession to have taken place in 1659. But the reign certainly began in A.D. 1658, and should be reckoned as running from the official date, June 2 of that year. The dates given above are in New Style (N.S.). If recorded in Old Style (O.S.) they would be ten days earlier. (See Irvine and Hoernle in _J.A.S.B._, Part I, vol. lxii (1893), pp. 256-67; and Irvine, in _Ind. Ant._, vol. xl (1911), pp. 74, 75.) 3. The author invariably ignores the fact that daughters and other female relatives inherit under Muhammadan law. 4. Hindoo law does not ordinarily recognize any right of succession for daughters, and so differs essentially from the law of Islam. The exceptions to this general rule are unimportant. 5. The experience of most officials does not confirm this statement. 6. The statement now requires modification. After the Central Provinces were constituted in 1861, the principle of succession by primogeniture was maintained only in the Hoshangabad, Chhindwara, Chanda, and Chhattisgarh Districts. But even there the legal effect of the restrictions on alienation and partition is 'not quite free from doubt' (_I.G._ 1908, x. 73). The tendency of the law courts is to apply everywhere uniform rules taken from the Hindoo law books. 7. 'See _ante_, Chapter 10, notes 10, 16. The gradual conversion of tenure by leases from Government into proprietary right in land has brought the land under the operation of the ordinary Hindoo law, and each member of a joint family can now enforce partitio
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339  
340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Aurangzeb

 
Hindoo
 
Irvine
 

succession

 
daughters
 
beginning
 

reckoned

 

statement

 

requires

 

general


modification

 

experience

 
officials
 

confirm

 
unimportant
 

relatives

 

inherit

 
Muhammadan
 

female

 

author


invariably

 

ignores

 

partitio

 

enforce

 

differs

 
essentially
 

ordinarily

 

recognize

 
Central
 

exceptions


leases

 

uniform

 

courts

 

tendency

 
proprietary
 

gradual

 

conversion

 

tenure

 

brought

 
Chapter

ordinary
 
operation
 

Government

 

Hoshangabad

 

Chhindwara

 

Chanda

 

maintained

 

primogeniture

 
constituted
 

family