FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699  
700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   >>  
the man has been such that an example is unnecessary; or he may have relations in the regiment of excellent character, upon whom some part of the disgrace would fall if he were flogged.' Still no court martial but a general one could sentence a soldier to be simply dismissed. To secure his dismissal they must first sentence him to be flogged. On the 24th of February, 1835, the Governor-General of India in Council, Lord William Bentinck, directed that the practice of punishing soldiers of the native army by the cat-o'-nine-tails, or rattan, be discontinued at all the presidencies; and that henceforth it shall be competent to any regimental, detachment, or brigade court martial to sentence a soldier of the native army to dismissal from the service for any offence for which such soldier might now be punished by flogging, provided such sentence of dismissal shall not be carried into effect unless confirmed by the general or other officer commanding the division.' For crimes involving higher penalties, soldiers were, as heretofore, committed for trial before general courts martial. By Act 23 of 1839, passed by the Legislative Council of India on the 23rd of September, it is made competent for courts martial to sentence soldiers of the native army in the service of the East India Company to the punishment of dismissal, and to be imprisoned, with or without hard labour, for any period not exceeding two years, if the sentence be pronounced by a general court martial; and not exceeding one year, if by a garrison or line court martial; and not exceeding six months, if by a regimental or district court martial. Imprisonment for any period with hard labour, or for a term exceeding six months without hard labour, to involve dismissal. Act 2 of 1840 provides for such sentences of imprisonment being carried into execution by magistrates or other officers in charge of the gaols. [W. H. S.] This last paragraph has been brought up from the end of the volume where it is printed in the original edition. The army has been completely reorganized since the author's time, and the regulations have been much modified. In October, 1833, Lord William Bentinck had assumed the command of the army, on the retirement of Sir Edward Barnes, and thus combined the offices of Governor-General and Commander-in-Chief, as the Marquis Cornwallis and the Marquis of Hastings had done before him. 7. Batavia was occupied by Sir Samuel Auchmuty in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699  
700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   >>  



Top keywords:

martial

 

sentence

 

dismissal

 

general

 

exceeding

 

soldier

 
soldiers
 
native
 

labour

 

carried


Bentinck

 
General
 

Council

 

William

 
Governor
 

Marquis

 

competent

 
courts
 

regimental

 

period


months

 

flogged

 

service

 
execution
 

officers

 
charge
 

magistrates

 

garrison

 

pronounced

 

district


Imprisonment

 

sentences

 

imprisonment

 

involve

 

reorganized

 

Barnes

 

combined

 

offices

 

Edward

 

retirement


assumed
 

command

 

Commander

 

occupied

 

Samuel

 

Auchmuty

 

Batavia

 

Cornwallis

 

Hastings

 

October