FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698  
699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   >>  
rt martial. General Orders by the Commander-in-Chief, Lord Combermere, of the 19th of March, 1827, declare that his Excellency is of opinion that the quiet and orderly habits of the native soldiers are such that it can very seldom be necessary to have recourse to the punishment of flogging, which might be almost entirely abolished with great advantage to their character and feelings; and directs that no native soldier shall in future be sentenced to corporal punishment unless for the crime of _stealing, marauding, or gross insubordination_, where the individuals are deemed unworthy to continue in the ranks of the army. No such sentence by a regimental, detachment, or brigade court martial was to be carried into effect till confirmed by the general officer commanding the division. When flogged the soldier was invariably to be discharged from the service. A circular letter from the Commander-in-Chief, Lord Combermere, on the 16th of June, 1827, directs that sentence to corporal punishment is not to be restricted to the three crimes of _theft, marauding, or gross insubordination_; but that it is not to be awarded except for very serious offences against discipline, or actions of a disgraceful or infamous nature, which show those who committed them to be unfit for the service; that the officer who assembles the court may remit the sentence of corporal punishment, and the dismissal involved in it; but cannot carry it into effect till confirmed by the officer commanding the division, except when an immediate example is indispensably necessary, as in the case of plundering and violence on the part of soldiers in the line of march. In all cases the soldier who has been flogged must be dismissed. A circular letter by the Commander-in-Chief, Sir E. Barnes, 2nd of November, 1832, dispenses with the duty of submitting the sentence of regimental, detachment, and brigade courts martial for confirmation to the general officer commanding the division; and authorizes the officer who assembles the court to carry the sentence into effect without reference to higher authority; and to mitigate the punishment awarded, or remit it altogether; and to order the dismissal of the soldier who has been sentenced to corporal punishment, though he should remit the flogging, 'for it may happen that a soldier may be found guilty of an offence which renders it improper that he should remain any longer in the service, although the general conduct of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698  
699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   >>  



Top keywords:

punishment

 

officer

 

sentence

 

soldier

 

corporal

 

martial

 
general
 
Commander
 

commanding

 

service


division

 
effect
 

regimental

 

flogged

 
directs
 

letter

 

circular

 
detachment
 

insubordination

 

marauding


sentenced

 

soldiers

 

Combermere

 
native
 

confirmed

 
assembles
 

dismissal

 

awarded

 

brigade

 

flogging


involved

 

conduct

 

violence

 

plundering

 

indispensably

 

mitigate

 

altogether

 

authority

 

higher

 

reference


happen
 

renders

 

remain

 

improper

 

offence

 

guilty

 

authorizes

 

confirmation

 

dismissed

 

longer