FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245  
246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   >>  
Delacroix. Corot. Millet. Daubigny. Courbet. Daumier. Decamps. Manet. Degas. Among these Turner stands out conspicuously from the rest, and he would be included by anyone in a list of twenty, or perhaps a dozen, of the greatest painters in the world. But oddly enough his influence on the art in general has been comparatively small, if we are to judge by its effects on other painters up to the present, while that of Constable has been considerably greater. Manet, again, and Delacroix, have accomplished far more for the history of painting than any other two in our lists--and yet their names are scarcely known outside the circle of those who know anything at all about painting. For the English public at large an entirely different list would probably prove the superiority of their own race to their complete satisfaction--in spite of Meissonier, Dore, and Bouguereau on the other side. But that is only because the British public, owing to the monopoly [Illustration: PLATE XLIV.--JACQUES LOUIS DAVID PORTRAIT OF MME. RECAMIER _Louvre, Paris_] enjoyed by the Royal Academy, have never had a chance of judging for themselves what they approve of and what they do not, and their taste has been vitiated for generations by the exhibition of what this self-constituted authority, no doubt unconsciously, conceives to be best for them--and which, as might be expected, is usually found to coincide pretty nearly with the sort of thing they are capable of producing themselves. Hogarth's predictions at the time the Academy was instituted have in a great measure come perfectly true, and the only benefit that it has been to the English School of painting is that it has kept it going. How far this may be called a benefit is at least arguable, but in the main it is probable that if so many bad pictures had not been painted, there would not have been so many good ones. On the other hand, the removal of a man like Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema from his native sphere of influence is quite enough to account for the unlooked-for flowering of blossoms like the brothers Maris, Bosboom, Israels, and Mauve in the Dutch garden, and if that is so, one need not grudge him his interment amongst Nelson, Wellington, and other heroes of our own. In a word, the history of painting in the nineteenth century is Revolt. What it is going to be in the twentieth I am fortunately not called upon to say; but if I may throw out an opinion based upon wh
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245  
246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   >>  



Top keywords:
painting
 

Delacroix

 

history

 

benefit

 

called

 

Academy

 

English

 

public

 

painters

 
influence

arguable

 

perfectly

 

School

 

pretty

 

coincide

 

conceives

 

unconsciously

 
expected
 
capable
 
instituted

measure

 

producing

 

Hogarth

 

predictions

 

Lawrence

 

Nelson

 

Wellington

 

heroes

 
interment
 

garden


grudge
 
nineteenth
 

opinion

 
fortunately
 
century
 
Revolt
 

twentieth

 

Israels

 
removal
 
probable

pictures
 

painted

 

authority

 
blossoms
 
flowering
 

brothers

 

Bosboom

 

unlooked

 

account

 

Tadema