FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   >>  
robably much more. "Ainsi ce Dejeuner sur l'herbe," says M. Duret, "venait-il faire comme une enorme tache. Il donnait la sensation de quelquechose outre. Il heurtait la vision. Il produisait, sur les yeux du public de ce temps, l'effet de la pleine lumiere sur les yeux du hibou." There was more than one reason for this remarkable picture surprising and shocking the sensibilities of the public. It represents a couple of men in everyday bourgeois costume, one sitting and the other reclining on the grass under trees, while next to one of them is seated a young woman, her head turned to the spectator, in no costume at all. A profusion of _articles de dejeuner_ is beside her, and it is evident that they are only waiting to arrange the meal till a second young woman, who is seen bathing in the near background, is ready to join them. The subject and composition are reminiscent of Giorgione's beautiful and famous _Fete Champetre_, in the Louvre, and Manet quite frankly and in quite good faith pleaded Giorgione as his precedent when assailed on grounds of good taste. But unfortunately he had not put his male figures in "fancy dress," and the public could hardly be expected to realise that Giorgione had not, either. As for the painting, it was a revelation. He had broken every canon of tradition--and yet it was a marvellous success! Another outburst greeted the appearance of the wonderful _Olympia_ in 1865, this time in the official catalogue. This is now enshrined in the Louvre. It was painted in 1863, but fortunately, perhaps, Manet had not the courage to exhibit it then--for who can tell to what length the fury of the Philistines might not have been goaded by two such shocks? As it was, this second violation of the sacred traditions of the nude, which had been exclusively reserved for allegorical subjects, was considered an outrage; and the innocent, natural model, of by no means voluptuous appearance, was regarded as a disgraceful intrusion into the chaste category of nymphs and goddesses. As a painter, however, Manet had shown himself unmistakably as the great figure of [Illustration: PLATE XLVIII.--EDOUARD MANET OLYMPIA _Louvre, Paris_] the age, and if we have to go to Paris or to New York to catch a glimpse of any of his work, it is partly because we are too backward in seizing opportunities so eagerly snapped up by others. The next great storm in the artistic world followed in the wake of one of Manet's c
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   >>  



Top keywords:
public
 

Giorgione

 

Louvre

 

costume

 

appearance

 

artistic

 

opportunities

 

goaded

 

seizing

 
shocks

eagerly

 

Philistines

 

exhibit

 

snapped

 

length

 

greeted

 

wonderful

 
Olympia
 
outburst
 
marvellous

success

 

Another

 

official

 

violation

 

fortunately

 

painted

 

catalogue

 

enshrined

 
courage
 

nymphs


goddesses
 
painter
 

category

 
chaste
 
tradition
 
intrusion
 

OLYMPIA

 

Illustration

 
XLVIII
 
figure

unmistakably
 

glimpse

 

reserved

 
allegorical
 
partly
 

subjects

 

exclusively

 

backward

 

EDOUARD

 

traditions