FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  
. 2) says with more probability, that Adrian merely degraded him. According to Otto of Freisingen (_Mon. Germ. SS_., vol. xx, p. 404), Arnold _principis examini reservatus est, ad ultimum a praefecto Urbis ligno adactus_. Finally, Geroch de Reichersberg tells us (_De investigatione Antichristi_, lib. i, cap. xiii, ed. Scheibelberger, 1875, pp. 88-89) that Arnold was taken from the ecclesiastical prison and put to death by the servants of the Roman prefect. In any case, politics rather than religion was the cause of his death. In a word, in all these executions, the Church either kept aloof, or plainly manifested her disapproval. During this period, we know of only one bishop, Theodwin of Liege, who called upon the secular arm to punish heretics. This is all the more remarkable because his predecessor, Wazo, and his successor, Adalbero II, both protested in word and deed against the cruelty of both sovereign and people. Wazo, his biographer tells us, strongly condemned the execution of heretics at Goslar, and, had he been there, would have acted as St. Martin of Tours in the case of Priscillian.[1] His reply to the letter of the Bishop of Chalons reveals his inmost thoughts on the subject. "To use the sword of the civil authority," he says, "against the Manicheans,[2] is contrary to the spirit of the Church, and the teaching of her Divine Founder. The Saviour ordered us to let the cockle grow with the good grain until the harvest time, lest in uprooting the cockle we uproot also the wheat with it.[3] Moreover, continues Wazo, those who are cockle to-day may be converted to-morrow, and be garnered in as wheat at the harvest time. Therefore, they should be allowed to live. The only penalty we should use against them is excommunication."[4] The Bishop of Liege, quoting this parable of Christ which St. Chrysostom had quoted before him, interprets it in a more liberal fashion than the Bishop of Constantinople. For he not only condemns the death penalty, but all recourse to the secular arm. [1] _Vita Vasonis_, cap. xxv, xxvi, Migne, P.L., vol. cxlii, col. 753. [2] Ibid., col. 752. [3] Matt. xiii. 29-30. [4] _Vita Vasonis_, loc. cit., col. 753. Peter Cantor, one of the best minds of northern France in the twelfth century, also protested against the infliction of the death penalty for heresy, "Whether," he says, "the Cathari are proved guilty of heresy, or whether they freely admit their guilt, they ought n
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

penalty

 

cockle

 
Bishop
 

secular

 

Church

 

heretics

 

harvest

 

protested

 

Vasonis

 

Arnold


heresy
 
uprooting
 
Cantor
 

uproot

 

Moreover

 

infliction

 
continues
 

teaching

 

Divine

 

Founder


spirit
 

contrary

 

authority

 

Manicheans

 

France

 

Saviour

 

ordered

 

northern

 

century

 

recourse


Chrysostom
 

Christ

 

parable

 

excommunication

 

quoting

 

quoted

 

Constantinople

 

Whether

 

fashion

 

liberal


condemns
 

interprets

 

converted

 

morrow

 

garnered

 
Therefore
 

freely

 

twelfth

 

Cathari

 

allowed