FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34  
35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   >>   >|  
ld be nonsense; because, so far as the prince appearing to be Bohemia's son (which was what he was most anxious about), the scene to be played was _really true_! The last correction I have now to notice is in the soliloquy of Autolycus in p. 522.: where MR. COLLIER proposes to read, "who knows how that may turn _luck_ to my advantage," instead of "may turn _back_ to my advantage." I see no advantage in the change, but the very reverse. "Who knows but my availing myself of the means to do the prince my master a service, may come back to me in the shape of some advancement?" This seems to me to be the author's meaning, and it is legitimately expressed. How frequently it has been said that an evil deed recoils upon the head of the perpetrator! Then why not a good deed _turn back_ to reward the doer? CECIL HARBOTTLE. P. S.--It is rather singular that A. E. B., who, as I have already shown, has so completely _shelved_ me in his remarks upon "Aristotle's checks," should now complain of the very same thing himself, and say that his "humble auxilia have been coolly appropriated, without the slightest acknowledgment." However, as our opinions coincide upon the passage in question, I am not disposed to pick a quarrel with him. I cannot, however, at all concur in his alteration of the passage in _King Lear_: "Our means secure us," to "Our means _recuse_ us." I will certainly leave him "in the quiet possession of whatever merit is due to this _restoration_," or rather this invention! Can A. E. B. show any other instance in which Shakspeare has used the verb _recuse_; or will he point out any other author who has adopted it in the sense referred to? Johnson calls it a "juridical word:" and I certainly have no recollection of having met with it, except in judicial proceedings. I can neither subscribe to the emendation of A. E. B., nor to that of the old commentator, but infinitely prefer the original words, which appear to me perfectly intelligible. The sense, as it strikes me, is, that however we may desire things which we have not, the _means_ we already possess are sufficient for our security; and even our _defects_ prove serviceable. Blindness, for instance, will make a man more careful of himself; and then the other faculties he enjoys will secure him from harm. _"King Lear," Act IV. Sc. 1._-- "Our means secure us, and our mere defects Prove our commodities." I should not object to your correspondent A. E. B.'s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34  
35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

advantage

 

secure

 

passage

 

instance

 
recuse
 

author

 

defects

 

prince

 

Shakspeare

 

adopted


referred

 

Johnson

 

invention

 
correspondent
 
possession
 
concur
 

alteration

 

restoration

 

serviceable

 

Blindness


security

 

sufficient

 

things

 
possess
 

commodities

 

enjoys

 
faculties
 
careful
 

desire

 
strikes

proceedings
 

subscribe

 
judicial
 

recollection

 
emendation
 

perfectly

 

intelligible

 
original
 

object

 

commentator


infinitely

 
prefer
 

juridical

 

checks

 
change
 

reverse

 

COLLIER

 

proposes

 
availing
 

advancement