FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2836   2837   2838   2839   2840   2841   2842   2843   2844   2845   2846   2847   2848   2849   2850   2851   2852   2853   2854   2855   2856   2857   2858   2859   2860  
2861   2862   2863   2864   2865   2866   2867   2868   2869   2870   2871   2872   2873   2874   2875   2876   2877   2878   2879   2880   2881   2882   2883   2884   2885   >>   >|  
t the maintenance of it was extremely difficult. The policy of the French emperor was considered capricious and dynastic, and not regulated by good faith and justice. His eagerness to create an alliance with Russia, at the expense of England, was obvious in every circumstance which brought the three powers into diplomatic connection. This was more especially the case as regarded the Danubian Principalities. On every question which arose in connection with those provinces of the Turkish empire, Russia fomented dispute between herself and Turkey, between the Porte and the Provinces, and between France and England. France fell in with the views of Russia, thwarted the Turkish government, bore herself affrontfully and dictatorially to the sultan, and peevishly and even menacingly towards England, by which nation the rights of Turkey were from the first consistently espoused. The boundary question was conducted so that it was difficult to believe that France and Russia had not conspired against the rights of Turkey and the policy of England, ostensibly to enforce which France made war upon the czar. Austria generally sympathized more with England than with France and Russia in these disputes, but no power could place confidence in the perfidious government of the kasir, any more than in that of the czar. Prussia showed neither justice nor magnanimity. Her policy was selfish and cowardly. Although the grandson of the King of Prussia was affianced to the Princess Royal of England, that circumstance made no difference in the pro-Russian sympathies of the king. He abetted Russia in all her designs. The Prussian people generally expressed disapprobation of the policy of the court, but did not show spirit or purpose to counteract it. On June the 19th, a treaty was signed at Paris, and ratified on the last day of the year, between Great Britain, Austria, France, Prussia, Russia, and Sardinia, relative to the frontier of Bessarabia, to the Isle of Serpents, and to the delta of the Danube. The policy of England, on the whole, triumphed in this treaty. The Swiss Canton of Neufchatel, which appertained to the government of Prussia, revolted against that government. In consequence of that event, much diplomatic difficulty and discussion arose in Europe. The moderate plan of arrangement recommended by England influenced the decision of the contest in a manner satisfactory to the Swiss Confederation and the people of Neufchatel. The King of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2836   2837   2838   2839   2840   2841   2842   2843   2844   2845   2846   2847   2848   2849   2850   2851   2852   2853   2854   2855   2856   2857   2858   2859   2860  
2861   2862   2863   2864   2865   2866   2867   2868   2869   2870   2871   2872   2873   2874   2875   2876   2877   2878   2879   2880   2881   2882   2883   2884   2885   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
England
 

Russia

 

France

 

policy

 
Prussia
 

government

 

Turkey

 

Turkish

 

question

 
people

treaty

 
Neufchatel
 

Austria

 

generally

 

connection

 

rights

 
difficult
 
circumstance
 

justice

 
diplomatic

spirit

 

disapprobation

 

counteract

 

ratified

 
extremely
 

signed

 

French

 

expressed

 

purpose

 

Prussian


difference

 

Princess

 

affianced

 

Although

 

grandson

 

considered

 
Russian
 

sympathies

 

designs

 

abetted


emperor

 

discussion

 

Europe

 

moderate

 

difficulty

 
consequence
 

arrangement

 
manner
 

satisfactory

 

Confederation