FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2610   2611   2612   2613   2614   2615   2616   2617   2618   2619   2620   2621   2622   2623   2624   2625   2626   2627   2628   2629   2630   2631   2632   2633   2634  
2635   2636   2637   2638   2639   2640   2641   2642   2643   2644   2645   2646   2647   2648   2649   2650   2651   2652   2653   2654   2655   2656   2657   2658   2659   >>   >|  
otives and policy were utterly opposite to those of the mover. The majority was large which rejected the postponement. Other modes of obstruction less prominent were unattended by success. In the lords the second reading was carried _nemine contradicente_. Afterwards, Lord Brougham, who co-operated with Mr. Roebuck in the commons, moved that counsel should be heard at the bar against the bill; this motion was defeated. The Bishop of Oxford, who co-operated with Mr. Gladstone in the commons, moved that the bill be referred to a select committee; the motion was refused. The lords accepted the bill with great reluctance, but continued to deal with it in good faith; they amended it in various particulars, to which the commons afterwards consented, and the bill became law. LOCAL BURDENS ON LAND. On the 19th of February, Mr. Disraeli moved for a committee of the whole house to consider the burden of the poor law and other local burdens borne by the land, and with a view to such revision as would relieve that interest. The debate was a renewal, under another form, of the protectionist controversy. Mr. Bright, Mr. James Wilson, and Sir Robert Peel, made very effective speeches against the motion. On a division, Mr. Disraeli secured a powerful minority, his motion having been defeated by a majority of only twenty-one votes. PARLIAMENTARY REFORM. On the 28th of February, Mr. Hume brought on a motion for the extension of the franchise. Like most of that honourable gentleman's measures, this was as ill-timed as it was well-intended. Sir Joshua Walmsley seconded it. Mr. Roebuck, Mr. Fergus O'Connor, and some other members advocated it, who did not bring any parliamentary or moral influence to its support. Only ninety-six votes were given in its behalf. IRISH DISTRESS. The parliamentary measures concerning Ireland have been noticed under the section of the chapter devoted to its history, and therefore only require a passing reference. Early in the session Lord John Russell made a statement to the house concerning Irish distress, and proposed various resolutions pertinent to the repayment of loans, and the modes of dealing with insolvent "unions." These resolutions were agreed to, and a bill founded on them was passed. IRISH FRANCHISE BILL. At the passing of the Reform Bill Ireland was not placed on an equality with England, and this fact operated strongly in promoting the disloyalty which h
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2610   2611   2612   2613   2614   2615   2616   2617   2618   2619   2620   2621   2622   2623   2624   2625   2626   2627   2628   2629   2630   2631   2632   2633   2634  
2635   2636   2637   2638   2639   2640   2641   2642   2643   2644   2645   2646   2647   2648   2649   2650   2651   2652   2653   2654   2655   2656   2657   2658   2659   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
motion
 

commons

 

operated

 

Ireland

 
committee
 

defeated

 

measures

 

parliamentary

 

February

 
Disraeli

resolutions

 
passing
 

majority

 

Roebuck

 

Fergus

 

equality

 
seconded
 
Joshua
 

Walmsley

 
Connor

members

 

advocated

 

intended

 

brought

 
strongly
 

extension

 

promoting

 

disloyalty

 

REFORM

 

franchise


England

 

honourable

 

gentleman

 

PARLIAMENTARY

 

reference

 

dealing

 
require
 

insolvent

 

devoted

 

history


session

 

pertinent

 

distress

 

proposed

 

repayment

 
Russell
 

statement

 
chapter
 

section

 

ninety