FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025   2026   2027   2028   2029   2030   2031   2032   2033   2034   2035   2036   2037   2038   2039   2040   2041  
2042   2043   2044   2045   2046   2047   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066   >>   >|  
iff. On the 31st of July, 1839, Messrs. Hansard again informed the house that similar legal proceedings were threatened against them on behalf of a Mr. Polack on account of some alleged defamatory matter contained in a report of the state of New Zealand, which had been published by order of the house of commons. In this case they were directed by the house not to take any step towards defending the action with which they were threatened; but subsequently Mr. Polack communicated to the house that proceedings had been commenced without his sanction, and that he had no intention of taking any legal steps in the matter. The matter seemed thus set at rest; but on the 26th of August, Stockdale commenced a third action against Messrs. Hansard, for again publishing the same libel; the sale of each copy of the report containing the alleged libel being, in contemplation of law, a fresh publication of it. This was also communicated to the house of commons; and Messrs. Hansard were again directed that the action should not be defended. In consequence of this direction Messrs. Hansard served Stockdale with formal notice of the resolutions of the house of commons; but notwithstanding this, on the 26th of October, Stockdale filed a declaration in the said action, wherein the damages were laid at L50,000. On the 1st of November intercalatory judgment was signed for want of a plea; and then Messrs. Hansard again caused notices against proceeding with the said action, together with fresh copies of the resolutions, to be served upon Stockdale. The action, however, went on; notice was given that a writ of inquiry of damages would be executed before the sheriff of Middlesex on the 12th of November. This writ was executed, when the sheriffs' jury assessed the damages at L600. Stockdale then applied to the court of Queen's Bench for a rule to compel the sheriff to return the writ of inquiry. This was ordered; and on the 23rd of November a writ of _fieri facias_ was issued and lodged with the sheriff, who thereupon took possession of the printing-office, premises, and stock in trade of Messrs. Hansard. On the 16th of December, Mr. Winsland, a builder, purchased of the sheriff goods belonging to Messrs. Hansard to the amount of L695. The sheriff, however, had not paid this money into the hands of Stockdale, when, on the 16th of January, the case of Messrs. Hansard was brought before the commons by Lord John Russell, who presented a petition from
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025   2026   2027   2028   2029   2030   2031   2032   2033   2034   2035   2036   2037   2038   2039   2040   2041  
2042   2043   2044   2045   2046   2047   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Hansard

 
Messrs
 

action

 

Stockdale

 

sheriff

 

commons

 

damages

 

November

 

matter

 

commenced


inquiry

 

notice

 

executed

 

served

 

resolutions

 

communicated

 

alleged

 

report

 

Polack

 

proceedings


threatened

 

directed

 

January

 

brought

 

assessed

 

sheriffs

 

Middlesex

 

copies

 
proceeding
 

caused


notices

 

petition

 
Russell
 

presented

 

possession

 

issued

 

lodged

 

printing

 

purchased

 

builder


December

 

office

 
premises
 

facias

 

Winsland

 
applied
 

compel

 

return

 

belonging

 
amount