FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089  
2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   2099   2100   2101   2102   2103   2104   2105   2106   2107   2108   2109   2110   2111   2112   2113   2114   >>   >|  
l of a tax, inquisitorial in its character, unequal in its pressure, and which has hitherto been considered as the financial reserve of the nation in time of war, is not called for by public necessity, and is therefore not advisable." The second resolution was then put and agreed to; as was also the third, equalizing certain stamp-duties in Ireland with those of England; and the report was ordered to be brought up. Lord John Russell's amendment came on for discussion on the 8th of April, when his lordship, in a speech of great length, charged the government with taking too gloomy a view of affairs, comparing the present aspect of the finances with that when an income-tax was formerly proposed. If new taxes must be resorted to, his lordship recommended a tax on the succession to real property, or the revival of some of the repealed assessed taxes. Mr. Goulburn defended the ministerial policy; and Sir Robert Peel vindicated himself from the charge of over-rating difficulties, and contrasted the state of finances which the Melbourne government found on entering office in 1835, with that which they left on their departure, in the British and Indian empire. The debate on Lord John Russell's amendment lasted four nights, most of the principal speakers on both sides taking part in it. On the fourth night the house divided; when it was lost by a majority of three hundred and eight against two hundred and two. The report was then brought up and read, and leave given to bring in a bill founded on Sir Robert Peel's resolutions. On the motion for the first reading of the bill, on the 18th of April, Lord John Russell moved that it be read a first time that day six months. A debate of considerable length ensued, in which arguments urged for or against the measure were repeated; after which the amendment was rejected by a majority of two hundred and eighty-five to one hundred and eighty-eight. The bill was then read a second time, and a few days afterwards the house went into committee. In committee the first question discussed was the period when the tax should commence; and the time finally decided was the 5th of April, 1842. The original proposition respecting schedule A was then affirmed, as was also schedule B. On schedule C Mr. Ricardo moved an amendment to exempt terminable annuities, and to subject them to special scales according to their market value; but, on a division, the motion was rejected by a large majority. In consider
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089  
2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   2099   2100   2101   2102   2103   2104   2105   2106   2107   2108   2109   2110   2111   2112   2113   2114   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

hundred

 

amendment

 
schedule
 

Russell

 

majority

 

length

 

taking

 

committee

 

government

 

finances


lordship

 

debate

 

motion

 

Robert

 

rejected

 

eighty

 
report
 

brought

 

considerable

 

pressure


months

 

ensued

 

unequal

 

character

 
repeated
 

measure

 

arguments

 
nation
 

reserve

 
called

divided
 
financial
 

resolutions

 

hitherto

 

founded

 

considered

 

reading

 
terminable
 
annuities
 

subject


exempt

 
Ricardo
 
affirmed
 

special

 

division

 

scales

 
market
 

respecting

 

inquisitorial

 

question