FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025   2026   2027   2028   2029   2030   2031   2032   2033   2034   2035   2036   2037   2038   2039   2040  
2041   2042   2043   2044   2045   2046   2047   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   >>   >|  
e of this report, on the ground that the allegation therein contained about the work was a libel. The defendants pleaded two picas: first, "Not guilty;" and, secondly, "That the words complained of in the declaration were true." The jury gave a verdict for the defendants on the second plea; and in his charge to the jury, Lord Denman said that the fact of the house of commons having directed Messrs. Hansard to publish all their parliamentary reports, is no justification for them, or for any bookseller, who publishes a parliamentary report containing a libel against any man. On the 6th of February, 1837, Messrs. Hansard communicated to the house of commons that legal proceedings had been instituted against them by Stockdale, for the publication of the report, in which he conceived himself to have been libelled. A select committee was then appointed by the house to examine precedents, and report upon the question of its privileges in regard to the publication of reports and other matters. This committee decided in favour of the privilege, which would protect any publication ordered by the house from being made the subject of an action for libel; and the house of commons, on the 30th of May, 1837, passed the following resolutions:--"First, that the power of publishing such of its reports, votes, and proceedings as it shall deem necessary, or conducive to the public interest, is an essential incident to the constitutional freedom of parliament, more especially of this house, as the representative portion of it.--Second, that by the law and privileges of parliament, this house has the sole and exclusive jurisdiction to determine upon the existence and extent of its privileges; and that the institution or prosecution of any action, suit, or other proceedings, for the purpose of bringing them into discussion or decision before any court or tribunal elsewhere than a parliament, is a high breach of such privilege, and renders all parties concerned therein amenable to its just displeasure, and to the punishment consequent thereon." The action, however, went on; and Messrs. Hansard pleaded to the declaration to the effect that the publication in question was a privileged one, on the ground that it was issued by the authority of the house of commons. This plea was demurred to as insufficient in point of law; and judgment was given by the court against the defendants, and damages afterwards assessed, which were paid over to the plaint
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025   2026   2027   2028   2029   2030   2031   2032   2033   2034   2035   2036   2037   2038   2039   2040  
2041   2042   2043   2044   2045   2046   2047   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

publication

 
commons
 

report

 

proceedings

 

Hansard

 

Messrs

 

reports

 

privileges

 

action

 

parliament


defendants

 

parliamentary

 

question

 

committee

 

privilege

 

ground

 

declaration

 

pleaded

 

exclusive

 

jurisdiction


bringing

 

determine

 

prosecution

 

extent

 

Second

 

existence

 

purpose

 

institution

 
representative
 

conducive


public

 

contained

 
interest
 

essential

 

discussion

 

allegation

 

freedom

 

incident

 

constitutional

 

portion


authority

 

demurred

 
insufficient
 

issued

 

effect

 
privileged
 

judgment

 

plaint

 

assessed

 
damages